One of the most commonly asked questions when we post pictures of procedures in which nullification (or a slightly less dramatic modification) is involved is, “Well, how does he pee now?” The answer, as many of you probably know, is that a urethral reroute is performed, which, as our handy wiki explains:
Many, including those who are DIY types, pierce through the urethra, creating a small hole to pee through. Others of us who have avoided the DIY mode, preferring instead to have someone who knows their anatomy and what they are doing, cut and stitch. Even though it is a relatively simple procedure, the success level for those who have tried DIY—piercing a hole through and hoping it would work—is poor…but those of us who have gone through the surgical procedure, which can be done as an out-patient in about an hour, [have been very successful].
[…]
[This is done by] tenting out the skin behind the scrotum, where a new urethral opening is created.
This sort of procedure, of course, isn’t only performed to augment genital modifications; it also essentially transforms the penis into a strictly sexual tool. Pictured above is Albert‘s recent reroute, which, as you can see, he’s had pierced with some simple CBRs. (Albert hasn’t undergone any sort of nullification, and the reroute is placed between his scrotum and anus.) The reroute itself was done professionally, though he wasn’t happy with the size of the hole and stretched it himself, which is likely why the ring of scar tissue looks a bit gnarly and blown-out here. Albert, however, says he’s finally happy with the results, and, hey, for something this intensely personal, that’s the important thing here. Another close-up, after the jump.
Comments
152 responses to “Piercing a Urethral Reroute”
Am I the only one who wants to see a shot from below when he’s standing up?
Am I the only one who wants to see a shot from below when he’s standing up?
lovedarling,
I do not clean the urethra between the reroute hole and tip of the penis. No fluids enter it so it stays pretty dry. I have done some sounding through it and hadn’t noticed any unusual smells, etc. I suspect that when I shower maybe some soap and water might get in.
lovedarling,
I do not clean the urethra between the reroute hole and tip of the penis. No fluids enter it so it stays pretty dry. I have done some sounding through it and hadn’t noticed any unusual smells, etc. I suspect that when I shower maybe some soap and water might get in.
<3thankyou. And kudos, I think this is pretty awesome.
<3thankyou. And kudos, I think this is pretty awesome.
heard about – but never read about.
interesting.
heard about – but never read about.
interesting.
NuderThanNude,
With your reroute opening above the scrotum, does your scrotum get wet when you pee sitting down?
NuderThanNude,
With your reroute opening above the scrotum, does your scrotum get wet when you pee sitting down?
Well, you just learn something new every day don’t you?
Well, you just learn something new every day don’t you?
JKo
Yes it does! And it really feels great. It’s like a tickling feeling and the warm urine feels great when it is cold. Of course I have to wipe afterward like a female. I view it like a female peeing through her inner labia.
JKo
Yes it does! And it really feels great. It’s like a tickling feeling and the warm urine feels great when it is cold. Of course I have to wipe afterward like a female. I view it like a female peeing through her inner labia.
Thanks NuderThanNude,
I think inner labia is “designed” to handle urine. The inside of it a mucus membraine.
Do you get any skin irritation from urine contact?
Also, why did you choose to have your reroute above the scrotum and not in the perineal area?
Thanks NuderThanNude,
I think inner labia is “designed” to handle urine. The inside of it a mucus membraine.
Do you get any skin irritation from urine contact?
Also, why did you choose to have your reroute above the scrotum and not in the perineal area?
Actually, the inner labia is the same tissue that would have been the scrotum had the development progressed as a male rather than female. When looking at a female vagina with a large clit the appearance is of a penis and scrotum that had not joined down the middle. I don’t remember the link but there is information on the web that describes the developmental process of male and female sex organs and how they are exactly the same initially.
I have not had any issues with irritation of the scrotum or penis however, I always wipe thoroughly.
My original intent was to have a perineal urethral reroute however I wasn’t sure of the method that would work best and since that is a difficult position to work on by ones self I chose to do my experimentation with the ‘above the scrotum’ version.
My initial attempt began with a piercing which was the easiest method. I wasn’t sure if I really wanted a urethral reroute (or could live with the lifestyle changes) or if it was just a fantasy so I felt that for up to 6 months I could try it out and if I didn’t like it just let the hole close up.
It turned out that I really loved the reroute however even though I had stretched the pierced hole to nearly 1/2 inch, when I removed the jewelery the hole shrunk down so small that it blocked the exit of fluids. My next attempt to keep it open was to cut a slit through the existing hole lengthwise with the urethra. The sides of the slits tended to draw together (when healed) so it didn’t work much better. From there all additional cutting was done with a dermal punch which makes a round hole and actually removes chunks of flesh. That approach worked much better but required 4 cuts to achieve the desired hole size when completely healed. (the fully healed size is roughly 1/3 the cut size) My current hole has an oblong shape and is open all the time. I can actually look in and see my interior urethral wall.
Throughout all of this I have come to really like the ‘above the scrotum’ position as it has a lot of advantages over the ‘below the scrotum’ version so I am less interested in following through on my initial plan. I have also realized how difficult it is to achieve a functional reroute and am now more convinced that a below the scrotum reroute (because of the additional thickness of flesh down there) would require cutting and stitching to be successful. Not conducive to a DIY procedure.
Sorry for the long response!
Actually, the inner labia is the same tissue that would have been the scrotum had the development progressed as a male rather than female. When looking at a female vagina with a large clit the appearance is of a penis and scrotum that had not joined down the middle. I don’t remember the link but there is information on the web that describes the developmental process of male and female sex organs and how they are exactly the same initially.
I have not had any issues with irritation of the scrotum or penis however, I always wipe thoroughly.
My original intent was to have a perineal urethral reroute however I wasn’t sure of the method that would work best and since that is a difficult position to work on by ones self I chose to do my experimentation with the ‘above the scrotum’ version.
My initial attempt began with a piercing which was the easiest method. I wasn’t sure if I really wanted a urethral reroute (or could live with the lifestyle changes) or if it was just a fantasy so I felt that for up to 6 months I could try it out and if I didn’t like it just let the hole close up.
It turned out that I really loved the reroute however even though I had stretched the pierced hole to nearly 1/2 inch, when I removed the jewelery the hole shrunk down so small that it blocked the exit of fluids. My next attempt to keep it open was to cut a slit through the existing hole lengthwise with the urethra. The sides of the slits tended to draw together (when healed) so it didn’t work much better. From there all additional cutting was done with a dermal punch which makes a round hole and actually removes chunks of flesh. That approach worked much better but required 4 cuts to achieve the desired hole size when completely healed. (the fully healed size is roughly 1/3 the cut size) My current hole has an oblong shape and is open all the time. I can actually look in and see my interior urethral wall.
Throughout all of this I have come to really like the ‘above the scrotum’ position as it has a lot of advantages over the ‘below the scrotum’ version so I am less interested in following through on my initial plan. I have also realized how difficult it is to achieve a functional reroute and am now more convinced that a below the scrotum reroute (because of the additional thickness of flesh down there) would require cutting and stitching to be successful. Not conducive to a DIY procedure.
Sorry for the long response!
Thanks for detailed response, NuderThanNude.
If you think we are getting off topic here, you can reply directly to my email (no spaces)
Yes, I know that inner labia and scrotum develop from the same “original” tissue, but I still think that the covering inside the inner labia is more mucus membrane than skin. Probably because that part of the covering is always inside, unlike the scrotum.
What are the advantages (for you) of “above the scrotum” reroute?
Thanks for detailed response, NuderThanNude.
If you think we are getting off topic here, you can reply directly to my email (no spaces)
Yes, I know that inner labia and scrotum develop from the same “original” tissue, but I still think that the covering inside the inner labia is more mucus membrane than skin. Probably because that part of the covering is always inside, unlike the scrotum.
What are the advantages (for you) of “above the scrotum” reroute?
JKo,
This post has moved far enough down the list where I don’t think anyone would care if it gets off topic a little.
You are probably correct about the inner labia being mucous membrane as it does reside in a very moist area. I suppose its also possible for the opposite to happen as in what happens with the urethra in a meatatomy or subincission. After being exposed to dry conditions for an extended time I think it toughens up to become more like normal flesh.
The things I prefer about the ‘above the scrotum’ reroute are that I can easily turn over my penis and look at it as well as to look inside my urethra.This makes me more conscious of the modification and turns me on every time I go to the bathroom. In addition, I really do like being able to see fluids exit from it and enjoy the feel of warm urine and semen running down my scrotum. It is a lot easier to work on also. Not to mention that there is more length of urethra available between it and the prostrate for sounding.
JKo,
This post has moved far enough down the list where I don’t think anyone would care if it gets off topic a little.
You are probably correct about the inner labia being mucous membrane as it does reside in a very moist area. I suppose its also possible for the opposite to happen as in what happens with the urethra in a meatatomy or subincission. After being exposed to dry conditions for an extended time I think it toughens up to become more like normal flesh.
The things I prefer about the ‘above the scrotum’ reroute are that I can easily turn over my penis and look at it as well as to look inside my urethra.This makes me more conscious of the modification and turns me on every time I go to the bathroom. In addition, I really do like being able to see fluids exit from it and enjoy the feel of warm urine and semen running down my scrotum. It is a lot easier to work on also. Not to mention that there is more length of urethra available between it and the prostrate for sounding.
Thanks, NuderThanNude.
So there is not much difference in my mind between “above the scrotum” reroute and a full subincision (as far as peeing and ejaculation goes), is there?
How do you handle peeing in the woods, when there is no paper available to wipe the scrotum?
Also, it seems to me your semen will be too close to the vaginal opening to be a reliable method of contraception.
Thanks, NuderThanNude.
So there is not much difference in my mind between “above the scrotum” reroute and a full subincision (as far as peeing and ejaculation goes), is there?
How do you handle peeing in the woods, when there is no paper available to wipe the scrotum?
Also, it seems to me your semen will be too close to the vaginal opening to be a reliable method of contraception.
JKo,
I don’t know anyone personally with a subincission so I couldn’t say for sure but I would think that with a subincission the urine would want to spray forward as it would from a meatomy (at least it did with mine). With having the hole in the urethra it has more of a tendency to spray downward. The urethra in front the reroute hole is contracted and with the hole being large enough all fluids take the path of least resistance (downward). That is exactly the reason that I do not want to go too large with my reroute hole. I do not want it to duplicate a subincission and to have the urine to spray forward.
Having a portion of the urethra in front of the reroute that is not functional (except for sounding) is very appealing to me and another reason I wouldn’t want a subincission.
As far as peeing in the woods… I now know why every female I ever went hiking with always made it a point to carry tissues with them.
Your correct about it not being a reliable means of contraception and the only reliable one (aside from a vasectomy) would be to have the old urethra blocked (even with the below the scrotum version). If the moment is right though it may be better than withdrawing all the way.
It does work extremely well with oral sex however (have experience here), where the woman doesn’t want warm semen squirting in her mouth.
To me the lifestyle change of having to sit (or squat) to pee is the biggest turn on. That works the same with either reroute location.
I really enjoy chatting about this with someone who is genuinely interested! Do you have any genital mods, and if so, what kind?
JKo,
I don’t know anyone personally with a subincission so I couldn’t say for sure but I would think that with a subincission the urine would want to spray forward as it would from a meatomy (at least it did with mine). With having the hole in the urethra it has more of a tendency to spray downward. The urethra in front the reroute hole is contracted and with the hole being large enough all fluids take the path of least resistance (downward). That is exactly the reason that I do not want to go too large with my reroute hole. I do not want it to duplicate a subincission and to have the urine to spray forward.
Having a portion of the urethra in front of the reroute that is not functional (except for sounding) is very appealing to me and another reason I wouldn’t want a subincission.
As far as peeing in the woods… I now know why every female I ever went hiking with always made it a point to carry tissues with them.
Your correct about it not being a reliable means of contraception and the only reliable one (aside from a vasectomy) would be to have the old urethra blocked (even with the below the scrotum version). If the moment is right though it may be better than withdrawing all the way.
It does work extremely well with oral sex however (have experience here), where the woman doesn’t want warm semen squirting in her mouth.
To me the lifestyle change of having to sit (or squat) to pee is the biggest turn on. That works the same with either reroute location.
I really enjoy chatting about this with someone who is genuinely interested! Do you have any genital mods, and if so, what kind?
Hi,
Thanks for the comments NuderThanNude and JKo, I’d not heard anything about this procedure before and have read all the comments posted here with great interest. It’s always good to expand ones knowledge of body modification with new ideas.
Hi,
Thanks for the comments NuderThanNude and JKo, I’d not heard anything about this procedure before and have read all the comments posted here with great interest. It’s always good to expand ones knowledge of body modification with new ideas.
at first i really didnt think much of this post but after i read asreals response u have to keep coming back to this post and reading what people say and researching what this is all about and the comedy that coems behind it as well.
mic i hipe your happy u just made teh world a better place wiht you uti lol enjoy spraying piss and cheating on women and and trying to take the path of least risistance buddy
at first i really didnt think much of this post but after i read asreals response u have to keep coming back to this post and reading what people say and researching what this is all about and the comedy that coems behind it as well.
mic i hipe your happy u just made teh world a better place wiht you uti lol enjoy spraying piss and cheating on women and and trying to take the path of least risistance buddy
Huh, pretty interesting. As someone who reads the blog only occasionally for the tattoo pics, I was drawn to this post after adding modblog to my feed reader. Have learnt a lot and from the point of view of a woman who has sex with men, I think this is rather practical. Above all I admire your taking full ownership of your body – it is yours, after all!
Huh, pretty interesting. As someone who reads the blog only occasionally for the tattoo pics, I was drawn to this post after adding modblog to my feed reader. Have learnt a lot and from the point of view of a woman who has sex with men, I think this is rather practical. Above all I admire your taking full ownership of your body – it is yours, after all!
Hello NuderThanNude I wonder if you can give me some information on
artificial hypospadia. Basically I want to have an opening under my penis or right above the scrotun so I
could have sexual intercourse. I have seen some picture of people that have done this but I would like to have more technical information about the risk and limit of it.
Thanks so much!
Hello NuderThanNude I wonder if you can give me some information on
artificial hypospadia. Basically I want to have an opening under my penis or right above the scrotun so I
could have sexual intercourse. I have seen some picture of people that have done this but I would like to have more technical information about the risk and limit of it.
Thanks so much!
Thanks Clipi for pointing out the medical term for this type of modification. I wasn’t aware of it previously.
I would be happy to provide any experience or knowledge I have on the subject however there is a lot of information that I could present. It might help if you would start by asking some specific questions.
Also, it might be easier to communicate through some sort of messaging system. You can contact me at (http://iam.bmezine.com/?NuderThanNude) through my urethral reroute forum or by instant message. If not I’d still be happy to answer them here.
Thanks Clipi for pointing out the medical term for this type of modification. I wasn’t aware of it previously.
I would be happy to provide any experience or knowledge I have on the subject however there is a lot of information that I could present. It might help if you would start by asking some specific questions.
Also, it might be easier to communicate through some sort of messaging system. You can contact me at (http://iam.bmezine.com/?NuderThanNude) through my urethral reroute forum or by instant message. If not I’d still be happy to answer them here.
Thanks so much Nuder for your reply. Perhaps.
What I would like to know is
1:- how safe in terms of infections would it be to have this artificial opening.
2.- Provided the opening is big enough for sexual intercourse how deep penetration can go.
3.- Are there any doctor or clinic that can help with this surgerY?
I am only interested in having this opening for sex and not the actualy urethral rerouting so perhaps
it will be easier to make.
Here are some pictures of people that did it.
http://thomaskraemer.blogspot.com/2009/03/artificial-hypospadias-hermaphrodite.html
thanks so much!
Thanks so much Nuder for your reply. Perhaps.
What I would like to know is
1:- how safe in terms of infections would it be to have this artificial opening.
2.- Provided the opening is big enough for sexual intercourse how deep penetration can go.
3.- Are there any doctor or clinic that can help with this surgerY?
I am only interested in having this opening for sex and not the actualy urethral rerouting so perhaps
it will be easier to make.
Here are some pictures of people that did it.
http://thomaskraemer.blogspot.com/2009/03/artificial-hypospadias-hermaphrodite.html
thanks so much!
I really don’t think it would be possible to use this type of modification for penetration as in sex. I’m assuming that you would want to have a penis inserted into the opening??? If I’m misunderstanding you please let me know.
The problem is that I don’t believe it would be possible to stretch the urethra to that point. Even if the hole were that large it would only be 1/4 inch deep until you hit the interior wall of the urethra.
As far as infections… I don’t believe there would be any greater risk since the scrotum still is between the opening and the anus and there is still a lot of constricted urethra to the bladder.
As far as getting it done… unless you really get fortunate you are pretty much on your own. Hence my problem for a ‘below the scrotum’ version
I really don’t think it would be possible to use this type of modification for penetration as in sex. I’m assuming that you would want to have a penis inserted into the opening??? If I’m misunderstanding you please let me know.
The problem is that I don’t believe it would be possible to stretch the urethra to that point. Even if the hole were that large it would only be 1/4 inch deep until you hit the interior wall of the urethra.
As far as infections… I don’t believe there would be any greater risk since the scrotum still is between the opening and the anus and there is still a lot of constricted urethra to the bladder.
As far as getting it done… unless you really get fortunate you are pretty much on your own. Hence my problem for a ‘below the scrotum’ version
Well actually Jhon Money state in his book that people do perform this type of artificial hypospadia for sex
as stated in John Money, “Gay, Straight, and In-Between: The Sexology of Erotic Orientation,” Oxford University Press US, 1990, p. 29, 44, 161-162, 206
You probably right about the short depth of the cavity but I still interested in learning more about this.
Thanks
Well actually Jhon Money state in his book that people do perform this type of artificial hypospadia for sex
as stated in John Money, “Gay, Straight, and In-Between: The Sexology of Erotic Orientation,” Oxford University Press US, 1990, p. 29, 44, 161-162, 206
You probably right about the short depth of the cavity but I still interested in learning more about this.
Thanks
Yes, I’d be interested in learning more myself. The most I have ever been able to stretch my urethra was to the point of getting my pinky finger in to the 2nd knuckle.
When I sound now through my reroute I can get a .475″ diameter pen inserted. The reroute opening is larger but that is all I can fit into the urethra
Yes, I’d be interested in learning more myself. The most I have ever been able to stretch my urethra was to the point of getting my pinky finger in to the 2nd knuckle.
When I sound now through my reroute I can get a .475″ diameter pen inserted. The reroute opening is larger but that is all I can fit into the urethra
Nuder,
I’ve read your comments with interest. I’ve tried several search on the subjects of both glansectomy and urethral rerouting and have not found any thing of real interest except for your publications.
I’ve had a few mods and I’m still looking on some additional ones such as flat cock head and reroute.
I’m also into urethral dilatation and I can get a .600″ diameter sound inserted..
I agree with you that I don’t believe possible to have a penis inserted. I’ve heard of sound insertion of .750″ !! but this is stil far from and erected penis.
Nuder,
I’ve read your comments with interest. I’ve tried several search on the subjects of both glansectomy and urethral rerouting and have not found any thing of real interest except for your publications.
I’ve had a few mods and I’m still looking on some additional ones such as flat cock head and reroute.
I’m also into urethral dilatation and I can get a .600″ diameter sound inserted..
I agree with you that I don’t believe possible to have a penis inserted. I’ve heard of sound insertion of .750″ !! but this is stil far from and erected penis.
where can i get, what you had dun to you
you can e-mail me at [email protected]
where can i get, what you had dun to you
you can e-mail me at [email protected]
Pete,
I’m surprised you can’t find much on glansectomy there are quite a few out there who have done it. Try looking on “tribe”
Pete,
I’m surprised you can’t find much on glansectomy there are quite a few out there who have done it. Try looking on “tribe”