A black-and-white photo of a person mid-air in a Superman-style body suspension pose, supported by multiple hooks in their back and legs, smiling joyfully toward the camera. They are suspended horizontally in a large indoor space with high ceilings and visible rigging. A group of onlookers—some seated, some standing—watch with expressions of admiration, amusement, and support. The atmosphere is lively and communal, capturing a moment of shared experience and transformation.
  • BME Newsfeed for Sep 17, 2005

    Please note that links may expire. IAM members, please help out by submitting stories!


  • Chin Tattoo Review

    Sometimes we pour our heart and soul into an idea. We research the hell out of every artist we can find, and we wait patiently for a consultation and then finally the day comes when we get tattooed. Then something goes wrong. The lines are a little off, the color is all wrong… it just isn’t what you wanted. What do you do when you think you’ve screwed up? What happens if your artist turns out to be nothing more than a pile of turd with a big ego? What do you do when no one will tell you what they really think? Well??

    You turn to me. I’ll tell you what you really need to hear. I’ll let you know what went wrong and where you should go from here. I’ll be that little voice that says “That’s a really really bad tattoo.” And sometimes I might even say “Wow! That’s grade A work! Consider yourself lucky and make sure you help out your friends with recommendations since you obviously know what you’re doing.”

    One of the hardest things about being tattooed is simply the fact that it’s permanent. The joke has always been that the worst thing you can hear your tattoo artist say is “woops!”, and it’s true. What if you just went to a bad artist for a small piece of flash? I know I’ve been there. I went in to get a small light blue star on my wrist bone. What should have been a 45 minute tattoo turned out to be a 3 hour ordeal. Of course I was 18 at the time, hardly knew any better, and I really just wanted something to remind me of my time in New Orleans. That piece has been covered up three times with black, and to this day, it’s still visible because of the scarring from the original “artist”. The one thing I can say about myself is that I learn from my mistakes and now only visit Top Shelf artists. I’m not talking about $350-an-hour artists, but those who are truly talented and care about the work that they do. I’m hoping I can help everyone learn from my and other people’s mistakes.

    * * *

    The first examples I have are of facial tattoos, specifically chin tattooing, which is most commonly — though incorrectly — called a Moko. “TA MOKO is a Taonga (treasure) to Maori and the purpose and applications are sacred.” — so unless you’re a Maori all you’ve got is a chin tattoo.

    I have to out myself as someone who is not a big fan of chin tattoos. More often then not, they’re not symmetrical and just generally not well done, and they cause the corners of the lips to look like they’re going at a downward angle. I’m trying to compare apples to apples here so we’ve got two pictures of two freshly done chin tattoos. The first one comes from our very own IAM:Xombie.


    Tattoo by Greg at Sinkin’ Ink Tattoos in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

    While the shine of the new tattoo is a bit distracting, I can immediately see that the right hand point/line is a bit wider and longer than the left side. The right middle line is also slightly thicker. The black is very bold though and initially looks to have been evenly applied. My only recommendation for this piece is that when Xombie goes in for a touch up, that the artist bring the tops of the tattoo up to the lip line in a more even fashion and to beef up the lines on the left hand side. All in all, I think this is a good tattoo. Bravo.

    I didn’t even bother to read the email that had accompanied the picture until after writing the review.

    “That tattoo is basically a design with meaning. The meaning of it is that I have never felt love before until my son was born. He is the Star in the tattoo. The lines wrapping around the tattoo are a broken heart. Which symbolizes with the star in the middle of it, that since he’s the first person I have felt love for, that he is sort of mending my heart, and pulling it back together again…

    The rest is just decoration.”

    It’s nice to see meaning in a tattoo with such a prominent position on someone’s face.

    The next example we have is on IAM:The Eternal.


    Tattoo by Rotten Ryan of William Vizgard’s Tattoo & Body Piercing in Winter Park, FL

    I really hate to do this, but I think it needs to be said. This tattoo seems very poorly done. Any tattoo artist that does a design like this yet doesn’t bother to square the lines deserves to be shot. One could argue that the person getting the tattoo is also be to blame, but I don’t think that’s the case. When you go in for a tattoo, you’re incredibly excited and it’s hard to make a rational judgment call. Sometimes it’s best to bring a friend that you can trust who will give you an honest opinion. Often times, when browsing IAM, I see pictures posted of poorly done tattoos, and the only comments on them are “Hey, that’s awesome” or “Wow, great tattoo”. Perhaps the line of thinking is that there is nothing one can do to correct it, so why act negative but that’s simply not the case anymore. There are many competent artists out there. It’s just a matter of finding them and using them.

    My biggest problem with this tattoo is that the right side doesn’t even come close to matching the left side. The biggest skill a tattoo artist should have is tracing. They do it day in and day out. So why do so many artists seem to have a problem with symmetry? Why wasn’t the left hand side of this traced over to make the right side? Why don’t they look the same? They’re not even on the same angles. The triangle and square in the middle are not straight. They’re slightly offset and the lines aren’t true.

    The outlines are probably going to blow out. I haven’t seen a healed picture of this tattoo but that is my prediction. There will end up being a hazy shadow around it and even some dramatic blotchy marks around the edges. They also aren’t evenly applied. The ink colors also look off. My guess is that the artist mixed a darker blue with white to make the lighter blues, which is an acceptable and common practice but these colors look milky and hazy.

    My personal suggestion would be a complete cover up, perhaps coupled with a little lazer removal (the two sides are off enough in places to greatly limit coverup options, but a slight touch of laser could help a lot) — maybe something similar to the example I’ve posted below, assuming the basic design motif is to be retained.

    There have been many studies done showing how a baby prefers the face of a person with a more symmetrical face. Denzel Washington was voted in People magazine as one of the 50 Most Beautiful People in the world in 1990 and then People magazine’s Sexiest Man Alive in 1996. This has been attributed to the fact that he has one of the most symmetrical faces out there. While I know most people in the community balk at the thought of doing something that would make you more appealing to the masses, getting a facial tattoo that is not symmetrical almost always does exactly the opposite of that. It subconsciously makes you less attrac
    tive to other people, whether they’re into tattoos or not.


  • ONANISME MANU MILTARI II by Lukas Zpira [The BME Book Review]

    ONANISME MANU MILTARI II by Lukas Zpira

    FIRST, LOOK INSIDE… THE BOOK IS THE ART

    Click here to order ONANISME MANU MILTARI by LUKAS ZPIRA now!

    A review by Shannon Larratt

    Lukas Zpira, as a person, is extremely stylish and fashionable, and this book, intended to capture his artistic vision, mirrors that aesthetic. But I must be honest with you. I’m not a stylish or fashionable guy, and it’s probably fair to say that I am actively unfashionable in fact. Not only that, but I don’t care much for modern art, and less for the explanations artists use to justify it — so much so that it makes it difficult for me to relate to this book, and for that I apologize.

    An enormous amount of effort has been done on processing and manipulating the photos and layout. In some ways this is good, because it captures the feel of Lukas Zpira as an artist, but, on the other hand, it also distorts the images so much that what most of us perceive as Lukas’s actual art, contained in the photos, is difficult to make out and is no longer able to speak for itself. Rather than presenting the pieces as they were created, the book retells them not as the world sees them, but as Lukas Zpira sees them. One could also argue that nearly all of the photos in the book have already been published online in a far clearer and more effective way.

    The text of the book I feel makes the same presentation error (or success), although I’m sure a great deal is lost in the translation (it is written with both English and the original French). Most of the writing is highly philosophical, abstract, and arty, and in some ways feels like it’s “trying” to be so. For me, body art is a very down to earth subject, and personally I like seeing it presented in terms that are honest and tangible. Since I couldn’t relate to most of the text, I found myself seeing it as boring, shallow, and misleading. Maybe I’m missing the point, or maybe other people are fooling themselves into thinking there’s a point a la The Emperor Wears No Clothes. I have no idea.

    While I do believe that this limited edition book is an essential addition to any body modification and body art library, I worry that Lukas Zpira has perhaps limited himself by presenting such a pure expression of his art — of himself — rather than opening a clearer channel for the uninitiated — or those like me with different tastes — to understand it. Or perhaps those people will never understand the core of what Lukas Zpira is saying — it’s not as if I’ve gotten better at choosing clothes that match as I’ve aged. If anything, I’ve gotten worse.

    But really, I’m looking at and reviewing the book in entirely the wrong way. It’s not a portfolio of Lukas’s work. It’s not a grounded discussion of scarification, piercing, and surgical body modification, nor is it supposed to be. If you’re looking for that, you won’t enjoy or find meaning in the book. But if you come into the experience looking to discover the essence of Lukas Zpira’s vision, independent of the corporal aspect of his work, you’ll find it. ONANISME MANU MILITARI II exists separate from the scalpels and the spatulas, and even separate from the skin that adorns its pages — it is a work of art in and of itself.

        – Shannon Larratt


    A Review by Jordan Ginsberg

    To give credit where it’s due, few artists in the body modification community have propelled themselves to “rock star” status quite like Lukas Zpira has. Really, he’s like the U2 of body artists: From day one, he’s made himself out to be the biggest, most interesting and important thing out there, and has done so with no apologies. Initially making a name for himself as a world-class scarification artist, Zpira quickly began winning crowds over with his sideshow-cum-fetish performance art group, ART KOR, which fused suspension and bloodletting with more traditional fetishistic aspects — such as Japanese rope bondage — in a far more sexual manner than many other performers were embracing at the time. Thanks to the uniqueness of his work, his larger-than-life attitude about himself, and his relentless touring schedule — taking his act and his art all over the world many times over — Lukas quickly reached veritable celebrity status.

    More than just a showman though, Zpira has always emphasized the philosophical backing behind the work that he does and the lifestyle he espouses, a body of thought that he’s dubbed “Hacktivism.” Rather than following the path of the modern primitives, Zpira’s Hacktivism seems to be the modus operandi of the cyberpunk-fakir — a methodology based on how these rites of the flesh relate to the future rather than their tribal histories.

    Onanisme Manu Militari II, Zpira’s new Hors-Editions book, is an unfortunate misfire in several respects, particularly due to its attempts to be too many things at once; unsure of whether it wants to be a photography-based coffee table book or a philosophical guide, the result is a messy synthesis of the two.

    The book is not an absolute disappointment, of course. Primarily a photo-based work, shots from a variety of photographers — including Zpira himself — are included, and by and large it’s all top-notch. Bright, brilliantly saturated colors contrasted with heavy shadows bring out the best in the subjects, whether they’re clients of Lukas’ bearing scars or implants he’s performed, or occasionally even Lukas himself. As a showcase of his work, the book works extremely well; Lukas is undoubtedly highly skilled, and brings to the table an exciting, unique style of scarification, as well as fresh takes on implant designs and other pseudo-surgical procedures such as ear-pointing and tongue-splitting, all of which get their time in the spotlight in the book. Often augmented with distressed filters and scorched backgrounds, the images themselves are generally striking and fascinating; sadly, they suffer from the book’s small format. Presented on standard 8.5 by 11” paper, high-quality glossy as it may be, photos such as these would have benefited far more from being published in a larger format, more traditional coffee-table book size. With shots as busy and full as these, each one should be treated more like an event than as just another page in a book, so to speak.

    Where the wheels really begin to come off, however, is the textual content. Again, Zpira is markedly philosophic in his background, and I wouldn’t suggest that he’s anything but authentic in his beliefs; that said, the written portions of the book largely come off as little more than pretension masking an absence of viable content. Though the text is limited to a handful of short essays — printed in both English and French — that are seldom longer than a single page, they’re as distracting as they are difficult to concentrate on. Now, this is not to put it all on Lukas — there are a number of authors featured in addition to Zpira, though their segments are essentially limited to discussing their (very, very similar) takes on Lukas himself, rarely reaching beyond fellatious back-slapping and sophomoric musings on any number of “cyber”-based compound words.

    Now, while not written by Lukas, the inclusion of these passages speaks as little more than blatant self-aggrandizement, which is not necessarily out of place altogether, but the extent of its presence here is somewhat suspect. Zpira’s portions, while marginally more substantial, are unfortunately disappointing as well—because they often suggest that there is more to the story than he chose to share. Ranging from the autobiographical and the political to the poetic and apocalyptic, the topics covered are broad in scope, yet all coalesce at a similar yet borderline incoherent point; south of “Be what you want to be,” but just north of “Evolve or die!”

    Zpira’s philosophy is almost transhumanist in some respects; not simply an acknowledgement that the human body is imperfect, it also embodies an effort to correct this biological error. Though, while transhumanists typically seek more medical and scientific-related fixes, the Hacktivist revolution is ostensibly an aesthetic one; a method of reinventing one’s self by reshaping one’s image and identity; better living through keloids, if you will. And of course, this is not to discount it, but to see it propped up as a grand calling of the future is mostly disingenuous, and tragically overblown.

    Finally, clocking in at a brisk 126 pages, the 40-Euro (roughly $50 USD) price tag is quite steep. Were it in a larger format and maybe 100 pages longer, focusing more on the photography and less on pretentious techno-babble, such a cost may be justifiable. It’s well produced, with a sturdy hardcover and unquestionably high-quality images, but the presentation simply does not do the art justice. While this is without question a must-have for admirers of Lukas and his work, those with little attachment or knowledge of him would likely be better off checking out his web site before spending the money on this book.

        – Jordan Ginsberg

    Click here to order ONANISME MANU MILTARI by LUKAS ZPIRA now!


    This page and its contents are © 2005 Shannon Larratt – Reproduced under license by BMEzine.com LLC. All rights reserved. Requests to reprint must be confirmed in writing. For bibliographical purpose this review was published September 16th, 2005 in La Paz, BCS, Mexico.

  • Real horrorshow via Kivaka

    So, a customer comes into my friend Kivaka‘s studio and shows him her extremely irritated daith piercing, which you can see in the picture below. It had been doing OK, but she’d wanted to change the jewelry or something, and couldn’t figure out how — her friend spent a couple hours trying to get the bead off and banged her cartilage around quite a bit in the process.

    Turns out she’d forgotten — or was never told — that her piercer had used a fixed bead ring (presumably to eliminate the possibility of dropping a little bead down her ear canal), and they were trying to literally tear apart a permanently fused piece of metal, leaving her with what could easily keloid and scar her forever!

    Lesson’s learned? First, know what jewelry is being used on you. Second, if you have a problem with a piercing and it’s not obvious how to solve it, don’t ask your buddy to try and solve it with force. Go see a competent piercer instead!

    That said, emphasis on the word “competent”. There are a lot of bad piercers out there, and Kivaka finds himself cleaning up a lot of other people’s messes, as do most good artists. For example, the person below came in to get her navel jewelry swapped. Notice that the marks from the clamps from when the piercing was initially done are still there:

    Now, it’s not unusual for clamps that have been put on a little tight to leave a mark for an hour or two (not that that’s a good thing). But this person hadn’t just been pierced. The jewelry was initially put in place a year earlier — this imprint is permanent! What kind of sadistic piercer puts clamps on their customers so tight that the marks become hard scar tissue and last forever?


  • I must have these nails!!!

    A lot of the modified women (and some of the modified men) you’llmeeton IAM appreciate the art — and luxury — of a good manicure andpedicure. In searching for rhinestones, *chel* (my hero!) has surpassed my searchingskillsand I bow to her, albeit begrudgingly.

    I also want the cherry onesfor my tattoo artist‘s wife… It’s time for me to send some chocolate to Dita of BMEJapan, and see if she can’thelp me place an order!


  • Take one for the team.

    If there’s one practice associated with the body modification community that enrages and disgusts the general publicand truthfully, many within the community itself it’s voluntary amputation.

    To be wary of it is one thing: Amputation certainly carries with it not only a sense of permanence far surpassing many other modifications, but also generally causes a major upheaval in the way one will live his or her life from that point on, with most people on the sidelines assuming the life of the amputee will be far more difficult and unhappyno matter how many stories there are to the contrary [MORE, MORE, MORE].

    While many find it comfortable to write off those with these desires as lunatics who just havent found the right cocktail of medication to correct whatever mental illness is plaguing them, the psychological conditions that may cause such desiressuch as Body Integrity Identity Disorder and Apotemnophiliaare absolutely real and based solidly in fact. These conditions even made it to prime time last year when a story of voluntary amputation became the premise of a very special episode of CSI: New York.

    As with most things though, peoples opinions tend to shift dramatically when the reasoning behind the act becomes something that is more favorable to the public at large.

    Be it for love:

    For God:

    Or in this case, for the love of the game:

    Brent Blackwell, an Australian rugby player who had broken his finger three years ago and has felt considerable pain ever since, was given two options: Fuse the bones together and give up his sporting livelihood to allow for proper healing, or lop the bastard off and continue playing.

    Normally the sort of situation where a coach may ask a player to just sit this one out, Blackwell went the amputation route, losing the ring finger on his left hand, and resumed his professional career no worse for wear.

    Admitting that it was a bit drastic, he added: I love my footy and love playing sport and if that’s going to help me to succeed at this level then it’s something you’ve just got to do.

    This scenario is not unheard of though: In the final game of the 1985 season for the NFLs San Francisco 49ers, safety Ronnie Lott got his pinky finger stuck in the facemask of an opposing player. Forced to sit out the rest of the game, he was given the similar options of reconstructive surgery and a term on the disabled list or amputation of the top segment of his finger, chose the latter option, and was back with his team in time for the playoffs.

    For these two athletes, amputation was nothing short of a heroic move. I guess its not gross if its good game.

    (Blackwell and Lott links via BoingBoing.)


  • You’ll regret it!

    Tattoo advice from Nik Kelley over at Precision Body Arts in Nashua, NH.


  • Radical ear work

    Last month we mentioned the new ear sculpting and reconstruction work being done by Sampaa in the UK, but I thought that I should also showcase some of the radical work being done by another mad scientist of the underground mod world, IAM:Howie of Luna Cobra. Here’s one of his extreme ear pieces that he did on his recent (and continuing) world tour: