A tattooed person suspends from hooks, laying flat, one leg higher than the other. Their head is back, and they seem to be smiling, dark hair dangling like an anime character.

Author: Shannon Larratt

  • Blair: Revisiting BMEradio [The Publisher’s Ring]


    Blair: Revisiting BMEradio

    I finally got around to dusting off some of the old BMEradio files — I hope there are at least a few people reading this who remember when it first aired, but since many do not, I figured it was about time to put it into the permanent BME archives.

    First of all, you can download this interview as an MP3 file if you’d prefer by clicking here. Please realize that’s a 25 meg file, and bandwidth costs money — if you enjoy listening to it, consider donating pictures or stories to BME in return (or money). I’ll also mention that it’s totally cool by me if people insert that into file sharing applications or post it on their own web sites as well, as long as it is not altered.

    Below — thanks to Vanilla — we have a transcript of the interview (now almost five years out of date I think, keep that in mind) we did with Blair (iam). I know that BME has many hearing impaired readers who have been waiting for this to be added for a very long time (I’ll add more as time permits). Below the interview is some info on where BMEradio is evolving this year:


    Shannon Larratt: Alright welcome back everyone I’m Shannon Larratt you’re tuned into BME Radio we’re here in the brand new BME Radio studio with Blair from Tattorama in Toronto. Also here we’ve got Phil Barbosa one of BME’s resident photographers who’s got extensive work done by Blair and we’ll be talking to him a little later about that. While you’re listening to this you can zip on over to byblair.com to see a little bit of Blair’s work. Although if you’ve been reading BME for a while you’ve certainly seen his piercing, scarification work, implants, and subincisions lots of times before. Blair, as somebody who’s done all of these modifications as well as having dabbled in tattooing, what, what would you consider your title to be?

    Blair: Um, you know what? I would just have to say probably just artist.

    SL: Just artist?

    B: Keep it simple. I think so yeah, because I think I’ve spread myself so much on so many different levels, I think at least I mean doing tattooing and doing scarification, doing branding, doing piercing and doing other different types of modifications. Um, you know I’ve done wood burning, and I’ve built waterfalls and things so to me I don’t see much of a difference in building a waterfall and working on a person it’s just a different art form.

    SL: So you’re not even just a body artist, you’re an – artist.

    B: Yeah, I think I feel more, more like that now, especially. Maybe a few years ago I might have maybe uh, been a bit more you know picky about what I called myself.

    SL: [affirmative noise]

    B: Even then, back years ago when we first did stuff for the BME, I couldn’t really classify myself very much. [laugh]

    SL: I think tattoo artists especially are real, real adamant you know that you know you pick an art form and you stick to it and you know you get real good at that, you don’t feel that you know you’re spreading yourself too thin, or?

    B: You know what, I tell my customers that quite a bit especially when it comes to, um they say that’s all you do is, is you know piercing, you don’t do tattoo and I think honestly if you’re going to be really good at something you should be quite, quite picky about it you should you know focus on one thing. But I think, um you know I’ve mostly focused on body piercing like you know navels and tongues and eyebrows and different genital piercings and stuff but I mean after you’ve done those, those modifications for so long it’s kind of like a base. You know, and the other things start to become more, more like hobbies. And there’s nothing more creative and nothing more, how would you say, at least I think there’s nothing more special than having a hobby that you really care for and I think navel, like the navel piercing and all the eyebrows and all the other kind of stuff that I think 99.9% of the piercers do for a living, it starts to become a little bit like work. You know, you can’t, I mean I must admit I love my job it’s incredible but after a while you know, you must admit it’s a little bit like work. It’s a good work I must admit but it’s not as exciting as like building a new waterfall and having an incredible idea in your brain and actually turning it into something or spending like two or, two hours on drawing the most amazing brand and think like, “Man I’m going to pull this off and it’s gonna look sweet.” So, to me, it’s just art. [laughs]

    SL: So is a lot of it taking, you know taking sort of an idea and realizing it? That’s the…

    B: Absolutely. Especially with branding, you know. You know you spend a lot of time drawing a branding and especially I think to be a true artist for branding you have to really envision what it’s going to look like you know, three weeks from then you know. And I think that takes a lot of skill to understand how the skin works and what it does when you burn the skin and implant it in such a way, so I think um yeah, I don’t know well…

    SL: Yeah, well we’ve got, actually we’ve got some exciting branding stuff coming up from Blair. We’re going to play one song for you then we’ll let you know what the big secret is.

    [song]

    SL: Alright, now here’s where things get pretty exciting for you. BME and Blair are co-sponsoring a “Best Brand in the World” design contest. The way it works is you come up with a brand that you’d like to have, I mean no limits, no limits at all, it can be as big, or as complicated as you want. The only deal is, you obviously you gotta be 18. But the only real deal is that you have to be willing to actually get it. BME and Blair will pick the best 10 entries and then the actual best one will be flown to Toronto to have the brand done and this is all for free. All you have to do is e-mail a sketch of your idea to BME and in one month we’ll announce the finalists and then a week later the winner. Blair, what made you want to do this contest?

    B: [laughs] Um, I just love branding, you know. I love doing big pieces. I mean it’s like um, it’s very much like a canvas, you know you need to have something to work from. You know, if you don’t have something to work from then you don’t have any canvas.

    SL: [affirmative noise]

    B: I think here in the city I mean there’s lots of people I can work on, there’s no question about it. I mean I have people coming from, flying from all different places and stuff, but I think there’s something special about somebody who really really wants it you know and willing to you know go out of their way a little bit to you know e-mail you, write a little thing about why they want to get branded, um I don’t know it’s very exciting to me. I can just imagine the person being so stoked you know to win this and to fly here and for me to see them in person and talk to them about it and actually see the end result, you know. I just think that’s really cool. Um, yeah, I just wanna do good work, you know, I wanna work on someone and I wanna have fun and I think um, somebody that’s really willing to uh you know go out of their way a little bit I think it would be really fun to work on them.

    SL: [affirmative noise] Most people that come to you for branding have you know fairly small and simple ideas, or? What do people normally come for?

    B: Um, I try not to really do a lot of work where there’s really a lot of simple ideas. If people, if someone desperately wants to get something quite simple, then, if I have time, then I’ll do it, but I think at this point in time I really try to um, [tsk] I guess you could say push my limits in terms of what people consider a traditional brand. Because I really think a lot of the people that brand out there are just doing really awful work it’s just really simple, it’s really crude, quite basic, and I think um, there’s so much potential out there for doing, you know amazing work, constant lines…

    SL: Why do you think that is? Is it difficult to do this type of branding? I mean…

    B: I think, even for myself, I’ve been branding for about, I don’t know how many years, maybe four or five years, or longer…

    SL: I think longer than that, yeah.

    B: Yeah, and I think, I mean, when I first started things were quite simple because you know you’re brand new at it, you know. But just like any other art form you have to progress, you know, you can’t just do the same thing for so long, and I think I’m getting to the point really where I’m almost kind of picking and choosing how I’m going to do a design, um, I shouldn’t say I’m picking and choosing for them but um, if they come to me with a rough idea and I can probably do a very simple rough idea.

    SL: [affirmative noise]

    B: But I prefer to sit down for a while and actually draw it in such a way that it takes a lot more skill.

    SL: So, a person comes to you, we’ll I guess we’ll talk about the one you’re doing coming up here. A guy comes to you, wants an Astro Boy tattoo…

    B: Sure.

    SL: Gives you an Astro Boy pencil case, says I want it to look like this.

    B: Or branding. Sorry, yeah.

    SL: What are the steps in taking that pencil case and turning it into a branding?

    B: Well, basically what I’ll do, is I’ll look at the design, I’ll think about where the person wants to get it and I’ll think about how big they want it to be. Branding is a lot similar to tattoo where you just can’t do the smallest thing, you know, because if the lines are too close, if they’re too close together they are going to bleed together in terms of like tattoo ink. In terms of branding it’s pretty much the same thing. If the lines are too close they’re going to breed, bleed. So what you have to do is you have to design it in such a way that, that when the whole thing expands you know after the thing’s completely finished then it’s going to expand and in such a way that it’s going to look like you want the end result to be. So…

    SL: So kind of like if you’re going to make a complicated design out of cookie dough?

    B: Kind of yeah, you really have to think about it ahead of time. Like, when I’m drawing it, I’m looking at it in the future, even though I’m, the drawing looks sometimes nothing even close to what the person wants.

    SL: [affirmative noise]

    B: Like the barbed wire I showed you today, it’s quite a simple design, but the end result is definitely going to look like bobbed wire, or barbed wire. [laughs] Bob wire. Yeah.

    SL: And, then the way that the person treats it, presumably during the healing process makes a great deal of difference as well?

    B: Um, sometimes yeah. I think to some degree a lot of it has to do with genetics. You know, either you’re a person who has really good keloid skin, tends to scar quite easily or sometimes you don’t. And I think it doesn’t necessarily have to do with your skin colour. I mean, technically it does. Some people have more melatonin than other people, but I’ve seen white people with amazingly raised keloid skin and I’ve seen black people who raise quite flat. Or not raise at all sometimes. You know.

    SL: [affirmative noise]

    B: But the one thing that I do guarantee is that um, the width of it and the design is going to look, it’s going to look amazing, whether it keloids and raises or not is something quite different. You know, it’s something that is out of my control and I put into your body’s control. Um, there are some things you can do, like you can pick at it and you can irritate it and you can do numerous things and I think that definitely will increase your chances of getting scar tissue, but doesn’t necessarily mean you’re going to end up with a raised keloid scar but you will have guaranteed a permanent scar and it will be quite visible, it’s something you’ll always be able to see, even if it’s flat. So, I think it’s kind of an old misconception of um you know the guy did really shitty work or something like that because it ended up being quite flat.

    SL: [affirmative noise]

    B: And I think, no matter who’s going to do the work, if it’s done quite well – on some people it’s always going to end up flat. And I think, um, people just have to, especially branders have to really um, learn to understand uh, you know what, what they can expect from their brand. You know, I think they have to just understand that they can do the full 100% but I think a certain percentage of it is not even up to the person who’s getting it, it’s up to the person’s, you know, genetics.

    SL: [affirmative noises]

    B: So, and I think once you understand that I think um, you know you just kind of realize that I did my best and that’s all there is to it. The rest is just up to nature.

    SL: Right. Now, about, what was it, two years ago? You picked up a cautery-branding unit.

    B: Yeah.

    SL: And you did a little bit of it. But even for your detailed work you’re still largely doing strike branding. Um, you don’t find that the cautery gives you more freedom and that you can do just as much with strike branding?

    B: I think the way that I brand for sure, there’s not much difference. I think um, you know there’s something really nice about holding a paintbrush in your hand. I mean, I’m really, I wouldn’t consider myself a painter at all. I don’t paint much other than you know, the walls of my apartment occasionally, but I, to me, holding my tool is very similar to holding a paintbrush and having to re-dip in the paint again, instead I have to relight, you know reheat the iron up. Um, and I think the way I brand I do like multiple strikes whereas a lot of branders, they’re just, I guess they’re quite new at it, they just kind of hold their breath and go, “Oh my God, one quick shot, that’s it.” And you know, I think that’s just not realistic, so I think, as for the cautery unit it takes a lot of the um, it takes a certain feel away from it you know, it’s like um, it’s like having a paintbrush and painting as opposed to doing it on the computer with Photoshop. I don’t think one’s any better than the other but I think, um for me there’s a certain, I can’t explain it. There’s a nice feel to it, I always, for years I’ve always considered branding very much like painting.

    SL: [affirmative noise]

    B: You know, I hold that thing in my hand and it’s just like these nice brush strokes you know, it’s kind of like that.

    SL: Well I think overall you, you know, you’ve made similar decisions before like, you know you drove a motorcycle rather than a car.

    B: Yeah, little skateboard [laugh] instead of a anything else [laugh]. Yeah.

    SL: Um, we’re going to play another song and when we come back we’ll talk about some of Blair’s traveling in Borneo and Mexico and collecting of a variety of indigenous jewellery.

    [song]

    SL: Alright, Blair you just got back from your second trip to Mexico now that was more of a recreational trip than a body oriented trip. What were you doing down there?

    B: [laugh] Well basically I wanted to tour a little bit through Mexico and um, and see some of the Mayan temples I also wanted to see Mexico city cause largest city in the world. I love chaos, you know I love big big cities, it’s amazing how they function you know, it’s incredible.

    SL: Are there studios down there?

    B: I saw a few studios down there.

    SL: What were they like?

    B: Their standards are a lot different.

    SL: Yeah.

    B: Definitely a lot lower. I mean I shouldn’t really say that but, the shops I saw, the standards were quite low. That’s all I’m going to say, it’s just a different way of thinking you know.

    SL: But mostly you were surfin’.

    B: Mostly I was surfing, yeah. That was the thing. Yeah, I met some amazing people down there and I surfed. You know I have to say one thing, I saw this tattoo shop down there that just scared me. I was visiting, I had a card on me and I thought, oh wow how’s it going you know, can I have one of your cards? He was tattooing this guy he pretty much just opened the counter door with his bloody gloves, grabbed the business card and dropped it in my hand and I just picked it up with my fingers and just dropped my card and thought oh my god these people, I felt so bad that so many people are being cross contaminated potentially. And not even knowing anything about it. That’s what I mean. Standards are a lot lower, that would be completely unacceptable in Canada. I’m sure it’s unacceptable anywhere.

    SL: [affirmative noise]

    B: Anyways, surfing is good! [laughs]

    SL: [laughs]

    Phillip Barbosa: [laughs]

    SL: You’re just as recreational but more oriented to this trip. You recently got back from Borneo.

    B: Right, yeah. It was amazing.

    SL: Now, you went over with Erica Skadsen of Organic and a number of other people.

    B: Yeah, it was amazing, you know. I went to um, to Borneo and I stayed with the Iban tribe and the Kayan tribe.

    SL: How, how do you get there?

    B: I was lucky enough to meet Erica a few years ago, you know ordering jewellery from her. She’s such an amazing person. She invited me to go and I gladly went. I’ve always wanted to go you know into the jungle and you know Borneo, I remember liking Borneo since I was a kid and just the thought of going there was pretty exciting. I mean, in order to get to the jungle you know what it’s, I think I was quite lucky. I think when I went with Erica I learned a lot about how to travel in those kind of um, how would you say, I don’t know in that kind of situation you know like not speaking the language, learning how to catch boats, learning how to…

    SL: Okay so what happens, you I mean I assume there’s a major airport somewhere in Borneo, or nearby?

    B: Yup, uh, yeah there’s a major, one major, I’m sure there’s probably a few, I’m sure there’s one in maybe uh Brunei, and there’s probably one in um, Indonesia.

    SL: So you land there then you catch a long boat up the river or what happens?

    B: Well, what we did was we ended up um, we flew into there, it took like, I think all together we spent about for me I think it was thirty something hours maybe thirty-four hours traveling getting to where we were going and basically we flew into Kuching City and then from there I think it was a twelve hour bus ride and then from there it was like a five hour river boat ride and um, it was amazing.

    SL: When you show up at tribal longhouses are you a tourist, I mean what do they think of you?

    B: I think um, because my ears are stretched, and because I’m tattooed and because I think those people don’t really see that many white folks you know I think there are tourists and that, that go up there, but I think that some of the places that I went to I don’t think they saw you know tourists and it’s such a long long time so I think it probably happens maybe you know maybe a few times a year. There was one longhouse we stayed at and it was, it was in kind of more closer to a major town four hours away from the other longhouse that I went to and they had like a little guest book and I think lots of tourists went there for sure. But I think um…

    SL: But not many of them would actually stay there?

    B: Most of them I think wouldn’t stay there.

    SL: I mean it’s not like a longhouse takes visa right?

    B: No, nothing like, it’s a bit different than that. [laughs]

    SL: [laughs] But when you stay there how do you eat, where do you sleep?

    B: Well I’m vegan so it was really hard, I had to bring so many vitamins and anytime I found something like you know any kind of nuts or anything I made sure I grabbed them. You know, where we went to we were pretty welcomed because, I think Erica was corresponding with one of them for such a long time you know with letters and stuff and man, they don’t get half of their mail, so it’s a hit and miss whether they’re going to receive it or not. I’ve sent packages and stuff there and I know they haven’t received it. Um, but uh, they, we made kind of rough arrangements that we’d show up around this time and uh, we went there and we were just welcomed immediately and I think it really helped that we were tattooed and pierced and I think, I can’t explain it, I just kind of fit right in there. I mean the life there is completely different, I found that a lot easier to adjust to.

    SL: Are they living like a picture book tribal life, or what’s it like?

    B: Um well there’s no telephones…there’s no hot water.

    SL: What do they spend an average day doing?

    B: You know they make things like mats and they do, they make um I mean they farm in the paddy fields, they go into the jungle and they hunt for um, pig – babi, and they um. Man, they do a lot of hunting um, they you know they fish in the rivers and stuff. Sometimes they use this poison root you know, and um it helps the, it’s hard to explain, I think what it does is it deoxygenates the water so the fish get intoxicated and they start floating up and you have to get them with spears and you have to get them with nets. So they’re always busy mostly getting food.

    SL: [affirmative noise]

    B: That’s the main thing. Without food you don’t really have very much. I think a lot of the men end up working in logging camps and possibly in oilrigs and stuff. And all the older men and all the children stay at home.

    SL: Right.

    B: Well, I stayed at like a I think all together, I stayed in f…six different villages. Some was for like five days some was like for two days some was for, I think the longest might have been for seven days in one place. And they were all in different parts. And some places were probably close to like, maybe sixteen hours away from anywhere.

    SL: [affirmative noise]

    B: You know, if you needed a hospital you’d be pretty far to get to that, that’s for sure. Uh, and other places, were not that far off because the, a lot of the Iban and the Kayan and Punan and all the other tribes, they’re all living all around the whole island, you know so some are close to cities and some are extremely far away. So, yeah, it was good. I can’t explain it. It was so, there was so much.

    [telephone ringing]

    B: [laughs]

    SL: Well, that’s annoying, uh we’ve got a phone ringing in the background that we’ll just ignore, we’ll let Phil pick it up and tell them to call back later.

    B: Yeah, I mean there was so much to know and there was so much that I learned, and I wouldn’t really want to be giving people directions on how to get there because I think that would probably be the worst thing for these people. So, but it was a good adventure and it was really, uh, really quite a trek through the jungle. It was good, I mean the coolest thing I did, I think was, was fishing in the river using that root you know, I didn’t even eat the fish because I’m vegan but these people are giving you everything. They’re giving you sleep, they’re giving you food, you know they’re giving you everything so the least I could do was at least you know catch food for them. Very minimal.

    SL: [affirmative noise]

    B: Um, it was good. A good experience.

    SL: And then right after that you did about the exact opposite and headed over to Japan.

    B: Yeah, that was a, that’s where I had culture shock. Because I’d been in the jungle for, by that point, I think close to I think maybe sixteen days, was the longest time I think I spent in there and to go from that I went to um, a friend of a friends place and they were quite rich. And with a maid and everything and I was in complete culture shock, I didn’t know what to do. I was like I was afraid to like mess up the bathroom [laugh]. I mean, from living, from living in the interior and going to the washroom anywhere you please or in like um little squats where you have to, you know you get the bucket of water to flush it down into the river. Going from that to like every faucet was finely polished and the maid would make absolutely anything you wanted, I felt so much closer to the maid than I did to the people I was staying with [laugh]. It was good.

    SL: [laugh]

    B: But it was a big culture shock.

    SL: Alright, we’re gonna play a little more music. I’m going to figure out what that phone call was and when we get back we’ll talk about subincisions and implants and if you thought the scarification was scary now’s when you should hit stop on your Real Audio Player and if not you’re gonna find out some stuff you didn’t know.

    [song]

    SL: Alright, well that goes on for a long long time so we’re gonna, we’re gonna break back into talking. So Blair, one of the more hardcore and maybe even controversial pieces of work that you do is subincision. What exactly is that?

    B: Well, basically subincision is when you, you basically cut the urethra open so that it’s exposed and then you…

    SL: Hold on a sec, we’ve actually, we’ve got Phil here, and you’ve actually done one on Phil. I’ll direct this question to you, why in the world would someone want to do such a thing?

    PB: Well for me it was always just something interest me the aesthetic of it, for one, it adds girth, like visually, it just, the whole esthetic idea of a subincision appealed to me and that’s why I did it and after seeing Jay interview Jay subincision, I think it was on BME that always interested me, like just from looking at it, it looked like the neatest thing and the idea of being able to adorn it differently by piercing it down the sides of the ridges, and the idea of having a whole other surface that’s sensitive all of a sudden. Where before you just had the base of the shaft of your penis and for most people it’s rather callous and numb and all of a sudden you cut it open and it’s brand new sensations in a totally different world, when it comes to your sexual sensations or anything.

    SL: Now, you know, the, I don’t want to embarrass your girlfriend too much but uh, just a little [laugh] does it work? I mean, it’s healed now are you happy with the results?

    PB: I’m happy, um, from what I understand she’s happy. She didn’t have any real problems with it. She was actually there for the procedure. Funny little story, she was there before she was, she came with me just as a friend, and sat through the whole procedure, documented the whole procedure and weeks later we started dating, we finally did actually um, have sex it was a different experience. I mean, it wasn’t totally different than anything else she’s ever experienced. I mean, I have multiple genital piercings so that was different enough but um, I think just the, things like oral sex were different and from what I gathered, I was told everything was different yet at the same time strangely more comfortable.

    SL: [affirmative noise] I think one of the things that Jay has always said is you know from a philosophical point of view one of the things a subincision does, is, because you urinate out of the base now it makes the penis nothing but a sexual organ. Uh, you know it loses all functional purpose other than that. Um, Blair, how would you, sort of in comparison to your regular clients, how would you characterize, who comes to you for a subincision?

    B: Um, wow, that’s a tough one. You know, I’m really picky about who I work on and I think, you know because it’s a subincision, it’s such an extreme procedure I think that, I mean the people that I’ve worked on really are people who’ve pretty much tried to do it themselves you know. I consider myself somewhat like a facilitator you know I’m not sure if I would do a subincision on absolutely anybody. You know people have to understand the implications when they get a procedure like this it’s permanent I mean I’m sure you could probably go to a plastic surgeon and get it refixed.

    SL: You can but it’s a mess afterwards.

    B: Yeah, I mean you pretty much have to think that like it’s a permanent procedure the people that I’ve worked on pretty much of other tried to do it themselves were still absolutely convinced that this is what they were wanted that they were willing to you know make it you know a permanent a permanent you know thing. So, um, I mean I’ve, I’ve, man, the people I’ve worked on are so different like you know from photographers to computer um…

    SL: And a real age range too, I mean Phil you’re what, twenty-two, yeah and…

    B: Yeah, I think two people I worked on were twenty two be other two were like fifty and fifty-five or something and I think it, you know, I’ve had I can’t even like really characterize them because they’re all completely different it’s just like tattooing and it’s just like piercing and it’s just like everything else I’ve done there’s just such a wide range of people you can’t really. I mean one person was into fetish, and one person was not at all into fetish you know I mean you can’t really.

    SL: Did fetish work it’s way into the procedure or?

    B: Oh, absolutely not.

    SL: And, I mean in his head, even if you actually didn’t do anything.

    B: Uh, ooo, I don’t know that’d have to be his head, I don’t know. [laughs]

    SL: Maybe you don’t want to know the answer to that one. [laughs]

    B: No, I mean I try to I consider myself much like a facilitator in I draw lines on what I can what I will work on I think even you know Shannon that I’m probably a bit more conservative than a lot of people what you call cutters or something but I have limits I really prefer to work on body modifications that were traditionally done by the lay person. You know, subincision was traditionally done by aboriginals in Australia, pearling was traditionally done in Japan and all over Asia I’m told also in parts of Africa, um I mean there’s so many different types of body modifications out there but I really prefer to stick to those you know. But I tend to change it in such a way that it becomes very, like I’m very picky about procedures you know because you have to be very picky about cross contamination and sterilization and all that kind of stuff so.

    SL: I’m assuming a subincision especially because you’re really opening the body up and there’s a lot of blood and…

    B: Yeah, absolutely but it’s the same thing as doing a cutting on somebody’s arm or on their leg you have to be very meticulous about, you know not cross contaminating, or not infecting them or infecting your shop for that matter you know. So you have to be very picky about that so I kind of take what I see as being traditional body modifications and taking the modern tools and the modern techniques that we have and using it you know to its advantage you know. But I think there’s a limit you know people have called me wanting the utmost extreme different types of body modifications and I know from what I believe you know from human anatomy that there are limits you know and as much as to see people on the BME with pretty extreme different body modifications as an artist I feel there are limits and I think I have safe limits.

    SL: [affirmative noise]

    B: And I think if people you know if I don’t feel it’s very safe and I don’t feel that they are suited to such a procedure I gladly turn them down I’ve had no problems with that at all. And I think, um it is a kind of weird procedure you know because it’s something that technically a physician can’t do I mean. Well I shouldn’t say technically a physician can’t do but I mean a physician’s not licensed to do a subincision. So I think for me being a lay-person.

    SL: I think doctors, yeah they’re very restricted in the type of procedure they do.

    B: Exactly. So I think I have to be very picky on who I’m going to work on you know.

    SL: [affirmative noise] Now, you know, I don’t know, which is trickier but you’re also, you’ve also done a lot of genital implant work.

    B: [affirmative noise]

    SL: Um, now you’re tools have sort of evolved over time, your procedure has changed. You want to talk about what you were doing first and then how it sort of changed into the way it is now? You know scalpel versus needle and…

    B: Yeah, I think I mean when I used to do pearling I used to use, traditional needle and stretch and taper and now it’s worked ‘til like scalpel. And now it’s worked to, and you know different tools for a basically creating pocketing and um it’s still something that’s still new for me and I still have to learn to work with these crazy tools with my friend Phil over here. [laugh] But I think, um yeah it’s evolved, I mean everything has to evolve. I think when you find something you when find a new technique and I think because you’re working on a human being that you have to learn to make things better you have to learn to make things safer, you have to make things more efficient it’s not like you know carving wood, you kinda if you’re happy with it you stick with your old methods. I think…

    SL: The first time, or the first couple times are inherently you know they’re experiments, I mean, you know you can do as much research but I mean, Phil, how do you, how do you feel about knowing that you know this procedure that’s being done on you, it’s the first time it’s been done and you know, who really knows how it’s going to turn out and…

    PB: I don’t know, I getting worked on by Blair for so many years, I just know that, I mean he’s a solid practitioner I guess or artist if I can call him that, like just procedure wise, bedside manner everything, and he knows his stuff it’s not something I’m concerned about that it’s you know I’m going to walk away being all mutilated or anything like that. Like obviously if he has a doubt in his mind as far as the procedure goes or the way this is going to be done it’s just not gonna happen. I’m, over the years of getting worked on I’m more than happy to put my trust into Blair’s hands as are most of his other clients I mean I’ve met other people that Blair’s done work on and they won’t let anybody else touch them, like piercing anything.

    SL: Well, I think Blair’s know that if he needs to make a judgment call on a procedure he’s usually makes the judgment call on the conservative side.

    B: Quite conservative side. [laugh] Yeah absolutely.

    SL: I mean, even though, even though I think people look at these procedures and really think they’re far out you know, weird stuff they’re actually still on the safer side of you know what people try.

    B: Absolutely, I mean you can just imagine what it would have been like you know a hundred years ago doing a subincision in Australia. I mean can you imagine. I just I mean the, it must have been quite crude you know.

    PB: All they had is a sharp rock.

    B: Yeah.

    SL: I think that’s important to point out too, that all these procedures have, you know they’ve been done basically by field medics. You know.

    B: Absolutely.

    SL: You know, with a real minimum of precautions that we have access to.

    B: Yeah. I don’t doubt that they really, they knew which herbs to use for this and which herbs to use for that but I mean the standards were quite different you know and I also think they’re immune systems were probably quite, uh, they’d probably be a lot more immune to bacterial infections because they were living so close to the earth. Where we’re living in a quite sterile environment.

    SL: And I think, I think they probably had less bacteria to deal with they don’t have, you know, the super bacteria that we’ve you know, evolved in the west through constant use of antibiotics.

    B: Yes, absolutely.

    PB: I think they do it the same way so many times over and over that they’ve just understood a very specific way of doing it. I’ve read that the Australian, the way they used to do it was basically with a sharp rock and some thorns to hold you together but from years of doing it over over an over you know, and passing it on to lay people obviously they understood that this is exactly how it’s done and it’s done the same way over and over and over and it’s just refined over the years.

    SL: [affirmative noise]

    B: [affirmative noise] Yup, I mean I had one client who was, he was HIV positive and my biggest concern with him was that my procedure was going to be the one thing that’s going to send him you know, over the edge. So, I um I sent him to a physician so he could get his um, viral loads and his um, and just basically see if everything’s alright with him and then the physician actually called me up in person and said that everything was fine with him in terms of his health and he’s willing, he felt that he’d be okay to do this procedure.

    SL: This was a, what was the procedure?

    B: This was a subincision.

    SL: [affirmative noise]

    B: Yeah. So, I mean, I had that concern…

    SL: What was his motivation in doing it do you know?

    B: You know, I think, I think he really had wanted it most of his life, and you know even before the BME site some of these people at least the two older people that I’d worked on had thought of this for close to twenty years. And I find that quite astounding and they never even knew of the aboriginals even doing this. In fact both of them, I gave them photocopies of this aboriginal of um, who had a subincision because they’d never saw it before, and and I think one guy had wanted it for so long and I guess he did find out he was HIV positive and he felt that at least before he goes he at least wants this.

    SL: [affirmative noise]

    B: So, I was, you know, glad to oblige him for sure.

    SL: [affirmative noise]

    B: Providing everything was safe. That was my biggest concern of course.

    SL: Now Blair, you’re not actually subincised yourself but, I mean you’re covered head to toe in a variety of modifications and when we come back we’ll ask you a bit about those.

    [song]

    SL: Alright, Blair, I’m looking at you and I’m seeing you’ve got your face tattooed you’ve got you know huge stretched ears, you’ve got uh tattoos on your hands you’ve got brandings on your forearms and I’m sure all sorts of stuff that I can’t see under your clothes.

    B: Cutting on my stomach. Yeah.

    SL: What, what are you trying to achieve with the changes you’ve made to your own body?

    B: I think when I first started to get tattooed it was kind of like a like venting almost you know. I had a lot of troubles when I was a kid and a lot of um…

    SL: How old are you now? I mean we look at magazine articles…

    B: Today I’m twenty-five.

    SL: It’s a different age every time.

    B: Today I am twenty-five. [laugh]

    SL: So you’re ageless. Alright so you’re having trouble as a kid and sort of expressing that through tattooing.

    B: It’s amazing, it’s and amazing I mean to physically put on your body permanently I think is incredible you know. I think it has a certain symbolic meaning that you can’t really do anywhere else. I mean you can’t, you can paint on a canvas, but it’s never quite the same as when you actually put it on your body. So that’s how I basically got started. And I think you know I got into piercing and I found that so incredible and it really taught me a lot about myself and a lot about you know healing in general you know. But I think now I’ve changed so much I’ve grown so much, and also from working in the industry for so long I think really I look at it like, one big canvas. And I don’t now, when I get a tattoo, I don’t really think about the whole meaning and the whole symbolic you know meaning behind all of that because I think I got my shit together, I know exactly who I am, I know exactly what I want, in life and I know that I don’t necessarily need to put it on my body you know basically I’d like to look at myself when I’m finished and see one big work of art you know, I want to see the bottom half of my tattoo, like from my waist down, I wanna see it like one simple tattoo and I wanna see the top half one simple tattoo. So basically I’ll have two tattoos in my body with exception of my chin and um, my hands are I guess a little bit different than the rest. They’re like, um, I guess, what are they? Little patterns.

    SL: We’ll get Phil to snap some photos too.

    B: Yeah. But that’s basically how I feel and a lot of the spiritual stuff that meant so much to me still do but they’re basically being covered over just for art.

    SL: You’re back piece is a tree of life, is that, is there spiritual meaning there or is it more of an esthetic statement?

    B: Well I would say it’s definitely a spiritual statement but it’s so esthetically pleasing, you know it’s like a Tibetan style tree with Tibetan mountains and water and I don’t know, it’s just beautiful to me. There’s nothing, I guess, what I really wanted on my back was like a little vision of paradise.

    SL: [affirmative noise]

    B: Life’s a bit crazy you know, as much as I like the chaos, there’s nothing nicer than simplicity and nothing is as nice as nature.

    SL: Is that why you’re starting this new business, building waterfalls?

    B: Yeah, it’s just a hobby. You know, I really like, I mean waterfalls is such an amazing medium. You know you think of a frame that you’re going to build out of concrete or stone, or out of whatever you choose to make it out of, and then you basically build from then on up. You know, what you want the structure to be, where the water is going to come from and you can kind of bend it and manipulate it in such a way that aesthetically looks pleasing but I guess more importantly it’s got to sound right. You know, so you put that all together in one big package and it’s just it’s incredible. I’m not, I don’t really have a lot of time to do artwork all that much but when I do, I tend to get completely consumed in it so if I start a project like a waterfall I pretty much go straight to the shop, I pierce, I work on everybody, I leave, I go straight home and I just get obsessed with my project until two weeks later, three weeks later it’s completely finished and it’s like, “Whooah.” What an amazing job. And I look at it and I’m just glowing, you know. And then, I don’t know, that’s it. It’s cool. Maybe that’s what art should be about.

    SL: [affirmative noise] Now, let me ask you, you’re brandings that are on your forearms and the scarification that is on your stomach. Was that a venting process or why did you get those or was that sort of just learning to brand and…practicing?

    B: Um, I think it was a bit of both you know. I don’t really feel like I actually had to try to learn much of anything. I’m lucky I guess, because it all just completely fell into place. You know, there was a time in my life and I’m sure a lot of people can relate to this and you feel really aggressive towards yourself and you really feel almost in a negative way you would like to either cut yourself or burn yourself or damage yourself and I really felt that, that was such a shame such a cruel. I mean, it’s such a negative energy, why would you want to inflict that on your body and permanently wear that? And I think…

    SL: You must have clients coming to you occasionally that…

    B: No, not at all.

    SL: No?

    B: No, because I think if a person is going to, if a person is going to do something negative towards their body they’re going to do it themselves.

    SL: Right.

    B: They’re not going to go to a professional and we’re going to sit and talk about this and how you would like the design, they’re not going to sit and do all that stuff so, just so that I can damage them you know, it’s, and I think for me it’s such a shame that I was thinking in such a way that I needed, I still needed to vent in that way but I needed to turn it into art. And I think the energies is so completely different and it’s like creating something positive on your body and venting that energy as opposed to creating something negative on your body and you know having to wear that the rest of your life and having to think oh man, I mean I’ve done, I’ve branded people who I had to fix up what they’ve damaged or cover up what they’ve damaged. One person in particular had you know hack marks all over his arm and they were quite, quite large and it was so visible and they were done in such a way that you just knew, you could just look at a person, you could tell you know they had a tough life.

    SL: [affirmative noise]

    B: But he wanted to cover this up and we designed a little um, a little branding, well I guess not that little, I guess it was a half sleeve.

    SL: Almost like a Kandinsky design.

    B: Yeah, it was very kind of abstract you know.

    SL: Yeah.

    B: But it was done in such a way that it turned his negative energy into something positive, it turned it into art. And I think he’s quite happy with it.

    SL: So there you weren’t just an artist you were a bit of a healer in that as well.

    B: Yeah, I think in some ways. I mean, I think in my work sometimes I’m a bit of a healer anyways because I’ve met customers who really need to learn how to meditate and I had time. And it was like, “Oh god if I’m fifteen minutes late it ain’t gonna kill me.”

    SL: [affirmative noise]

    B: And I basically sit with them and talk with them about meditation and teach them how to do meditation. It’s not necessarily a religious thing at all, it’s about learning how to get your own shit together in whatever way you find is suitable but it’s basically about getting your shit together and there’s something nice about working with people and um, you know getting to have small opportunities, little smidgens of you know helping people here and there. You know, I’m not sure how long we have but, a friend of mine told me something and he said, “There’s nothing more exceptional than a person who can work with people.” And he said that, “It’s one of the hardest jobs you can do regardless if you do, if you’re a physician, whether you work with acupuncture, whether you work with hair, or whether you do you know body modifications and stuff. It’s quite a stressful job and it’s quite a hard job you know working on that kind of level with people especially when it’s something very permanent. But it, there’s also something you can grow in such a way and you can grow on such a level that I think most people would find extremely hard to do if you are working in a factory somewhere.

    SL: [affirmative noise]

    B: You know. And I think, I think it’s helped me a lot. I’m sure I’m always going to work with people. You know, whether, and I think also, I’m not sure if I’ll actually be a tattoo artist or if I’ll actually be, you know I don’t think I’ll be a tattoo artist. I’ve done hand poked tattoos on close friends but, I’m not sure I’ll actually be a piercer or what I’ll be doing in the future. But um, you know, life keeps on changing and I think maybe in the future I might do some healing work. Possibly. I don’t really want to stick myself to one specific career, because I don’t think that’s very healthy.

    SL: [affirmative noise]

    B: I think just because you’re a piercer now doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll always be a piercer. And I think to make yourself so headstrong is just, it’s very, it’s just limiting yourself and I don’t really want to limit myself.

    SL: Well like piercing on it’s own is inherently a pretty limited field. I mean you can only go so far with it.

    B: You can only go so far, and you have to do something else. Absolutely.

    SL: [affirmative noise] Or you, or you do, or what happens is, as has happened to a lot of the really great piercers who’ve been around a while you get to hate piercing.

    B: You get to burn out. You hate piercing you burn out, and you just have to find ways to keep things moving, keep things changing. And you know change your perspective and stuff, and I just think it’s really important, that you know people shouldn’t just stick to doing, stick to doing what they’re doing I mean you always need the option of changing.

    SL: You keep growing and learning, I mean you’ve been taking, what is it trumpet classes and dancin’.

    B: Absolutely. [laugh] Photography, and surfing, what else have I done, my god, I don’t know. I’ve done so much. I took hang gliding once and I got my scuba diving license and I studied carnivorous plants and horticulture and I don’t know, karate [laugh]. That’s all my life.

    SL: Now I don’t know if this an embarrassing question but I mean, the brands that you’ve got and the cuttings on your stomach, I mean they prove that you can, you can you know handle a great deal of, a great deal of discomfort.

    B: Absolutely.

    SL: But you’ve been getting tattooed under anesthetic. Um…why, why is that? Why, you know?

    B: Yeah. Do you want to know why? Because I think, I think I’m not sure, but I think because of being vegan and I think also I’ve been tattooing my body and branding myself and piercing myself and pushing my limits so far for so long and on a physical level that I think it’s really hard on my system to get tattooed you know. Like for example, you know when you get tattooed, it hurts, your liver constricts because your body’s under stress and all your organs end up you know paying for it so you end up feeling you know quite irritable. And I think back when I was I think 20 years old, not that I’m that old [laugh] now back when I was 20 years old it was great, it was all a completely new experience to me. But I’ve been tattooing my legs almost solid black for such a long time doing this design that we’re working on that I, it’s just very difficult that I leave the place feeling like I got hit by a Mac truck you know and I’m just completely exhausted and to do all that and to be able to work on all my customers and to give them my attention or at least give them the attention that I think they would deserve it’s really hard to do that and get tattooed once a week. It’s just it’s impossible.

    SL: [affirmative noise]

    B: And I think I’m not really concerned about being such a macho guy or such a man really I just wanna, I just wanna have nice work on my body. There’s definitely enough pain involved with healing it you know, and I’m really looking forward to doing another suspension hanging in the future. So, I think um, there comes a time and a place in life where you have to find a balance you know and I think my balance is, you know I’m planning on being completely tattooed, I know it’s probably going to take some time off of my life.

    SL: What, I mean, what, I mean for the last, I’m not going to say for how many years but for the last number of years you know it’s been a constant constant process of body change for you.

    B: Absolutely.

    SL: Things always evolving, always evolving. What’s going to happen when that stops? I mean when your body is filled up, when you’ve got it where you want it, you know, and you’ve still got another sixty years to live?

    B: Oh, it’s okay. [laugh] You know what, I swore I was not going to be tattooed after I’m thirty-five, because I really, I really want to get all my work done early. You know.

    SL: Then you can get onto other things.

    B: Then I can get onto other things, I can enjoy my life. I mean there is always going to be touchups. Like I said there’s always going to be suspension hangings. It’s such a spiritual, it’s such a spiritual and emotionally growing thing that I could never not do that. I mean, I don’t care how intense the pain is. It’s so worth it. You know, so that will always happen and um, I mean piercing is great, you can always take it out.

    SL: What do you get, what do you get out of a suspension? What was that experience like?

    B: Man, I learned a lot about myself and I learned a lot about people and I learned a lot about psychic energy and how and how it works and you know like, for example you know when you do a suspension hanging you are either going to take it as what I believe is being two different ways. You’re either going to accept it and become more physically in your body because you’re physically hanging and you can feel it there’s no doubt about it you can feel it. So you either become either more physically attached to your body or you can leave your body if you choose not to like it or if for some reason you find it difficult you can leave your body you know. For me I felt very, it was very easy to do a suspension I was so clear, my mind was so clear, and I pretty much knew what it was going to feel like, way in advance. It was almost like something I had done already, but after I did that I found I was so, so in my body that I could really feel everyone’s energy so clearly I could feel all the different issues and all their different problems and I could feel, I could feel the walls around me you know, it was quite, quite a difficult experience.

    SL: [affirmative noise]

    B: It was very difficult.

    SL: Almost, almost like it opened you up.

    B: It opened me up on such a huge level, and that’s such a good experience. I mean it was painful and it was difficult but I learned so much from it and I think um, I just can’t wait to do the next one. I can’t even imagine how it’s going to change me. You know it changed me so much doing the suspension, I was quite afraid of many things after you know I was afraid of other people’s energy you know being some people are so crude and so blah, so forceful you know I found it very difficult to separate myself between that. That’s also something I learned a lot in Borneo. I learned a lot about myself and I learned a lot about separating my energy from other people’s energy. That’s a whole other story, we’ll have to do that on another interview.

    SL: Yeah, I think we, we got enough words still unsaid to fill another couple hours.

    B: [laugh] Yeah.

    SL: Maybe at some point what I’d like to do to is get a bunch of people who’ve done subincisions and you know do a round table show or…

    B: Or people that have done suspensions and talk about that.

    SL: That is actually what I meant to say. [laugh]

    B: [laugh]

    SL: I don’t know, if I’ll edit and correct myself or I’ll let the world know how foolish I am.

    B: [laugh]

    PB: [laugh]

    SL: [laugh] Anyway, I think that we’ve hit our time limit. Blair, is there anything else that you want to let people know or…?

    B: I don’t know. Just keep on growing. Keep on learning. I don’t know.

    SL: [affirmative noise] So someone…

    B: Maybe in ten years I won’t pierce anymore I’m going to be a waterfall builder, I’m going to be a world surfing traveler. Who knows?

    SL: Nothing wrong with that.

    B: [laugh]

    [song]

    Wow! You made it!

    Anyway, I’m very happy to announce that thanks to help from some good friends, BME will be launching a video magazine this year. It’s first issue will be release fall/winter 2003 on DVD.

    We’ve already begun filming, and our crew heads over to England in a month, and we are beginning plans for both a Scandinavian invasion and a two week filming tour of the mod scene in South America. It should be an amazing project!

    Shannon Larratt
    BMEzine.com

    PS. So was this a Shannon-can’t-type cop-out?


    Next week? It’s a surprise!

  • Why I won’t see any more Adam Sandler movies [The Publisher’s Ring]


    Why I won’t see any more Adam Sandler movies


    "The worst thing I can be is the same as everybody else. I hate that."


    – Arnold Schwarzenegger

    As many as a full third of adult men suffer from gynaecomastia, or, to put it crudely, “man boobs”, with as many as sixty percent of men having suffered from it at some point in their lives. It most commonly starts during puberty and most of the time goes away after a few years. However, for the men that it doesn’t go away for, usually nothing short of surgical removal will correct the problem (in part because it usually goes unreported until it’s far to late).

    I think that first it’s very important to note that this has nothing to do with being fat. Gynaecomastic breasts are not made of fat — they are glandular tissue and are not dramatically affected by weight loss. Many men will purposely gain weight to hide the fact that they are real breasts, since being thin makes them difficult to hide.

    Boys with gynaecomastia are usually teased mercilessly by their peers, with the passive support of adults who don’t understand the condition. I’ll briefly recount the story of a friend who suffered with this all through highschool. Like most boys, he’d been teased about it and from that point on hid the condition, never taking his shirt off in public and never going swimming and only having sexual contact in total darkness. Even though he was fit and healthy, not knowing anything about the condition, he just assumed that he was obese and started to exercise aggressively.

    As he lost weight, not only did his breasts become more obvious, but they were also exaggerated by his now prominent pectoral muscles. No matter what he did, the problem got worse, and one day his parents found him unconscious, a victim of a drug overdose, desperate to escape the pain of the never-ending teasing that he couldn’t stop. Thankfully he survived, but it wasn’t until expensive and dangerous surgery that he was able to look at himself in the mirror with any semblance of pride.

    Men with gynaecomastia have usually been tormented so much that they are not even comfortable being naked around their life-partners — ask yourself, how comfortable would you be if you had spent your entire life from puberty being told not only that you’re ugly, but that you’re not even fully the gender you think you are? That you’re a poor excuse for a man?

    Adam Sandler’s new animated movie Eight Crazy Nights (which he both co-produced and wrote) was heavily advertised with commercials that show the following dialogue from the movie between Davey (Adam Sandler’s “naughty” character, who has been assigned the community service task of helping coach youth basketball), Whitey (the “nice” character, an old man), and a chubby gym student with obvious gynaecomastia:

    Davey:
    "Jelly Jugs, next time you come on my court, you'd better wear a bra, ok!?"
      (the student begins to cry)
    Whitey: "He was just kidding son, you have very nice boobs!"

    The disturbing message this sends to children is that not only is it funny to torture people because of the way they look (let me again emphasize that there is often nothing that a person can do to stop this disease short of surgery), but that it’s entirely acceptable. Yes, Adam Sandler’s “naughty” character does a lot of things people shouldn’t do — but tormenting kids suffering from gynaecomastia is confirmed by the “moral” characters as totally permissable, with those suffering from it being characterized as pathetic soft fat girlie-boys.

    I mention this on BME for a few reasons. First of all, because this condition destroyed a part of my youth (and quite likely played a roll in drawing me to body modification, where I was able to dictate what my body would look like). Second, because BME is concerned with body image issues and has a mandate to encourage people to accept and enjoy their own and other people’s bodies. Third, because many men who suffer from this condition also develop body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) which often pushes them into body modifications they don’t really want in order to distract attention from their disease. Finally, because it’s cruel to torture children (and adults) and it’s simply morally wrong.

    I call Adam Sandler out on this because this is the most public ridiculing of this disease (and condoning of that ridiculing) that I’ve ever seen. It is unacceptable to market a movie to children when it will have the end result of hurting children. I hope that Adam Sandler realizes how much pain he’s brought into the world from this movie. I hope that he knows that children seeing those ads on television are at the end of it not feeling like they want to see the movie, but simply feeling miserable. This is no better than a movie that teaches children that it is funny to dehumanize people for being black.

    Our bodies are there for us to use and enjoy. As decent people we need to let others know that that torturing people over medical conditions that are out of their control is no more acceptable than torturing people for their race or gender. It’s who they are, and nothing to be ashamed of. When we defile that truth, we steal something special from people.

    Thank you,

    Shannon Larratt
    BMEzine.com

    PS. A couple useful links: The gynaecomastia infomation page on keepkidshealthy.com (an excellent introduction for parents), and Gynecomastia.org (it has excellent support forums as well as lots of information).


    Next week: “Is it a world record?”

  • Should Freedom of Expression be a right? [The Publisher’s Ring]

     


    Should Freedom of Expression be a right?

     


    "If God wanted you to have a tattoo, you would have been born with one. Here in South Carolina, we still believe in God."


    – South Carolina State Senator Jakie Knotts

     


    "If God had wanted us to eat cooked food, he'd have installed a furnace in our throats."


    – Anonymous author of the Fingernail Mods FAQ

     

    Recent court cases regarding the legality of tattooing in the state of South Carolina1 have tested the question of whether the method of expression is included in the first amendment right of free speech. The court decided that freedom of speech is limited in its context, and does not in fact apply to tattooing (even though it has in the past protected far more socially questionable art forms). In this week’s column I will make the case that freedom of expression rights are both desperately needed by the modified community, and that in modern times, it makes sense to consider a freedom of expression right as a single unifying right that also protects speech, culture, and religion.

    Freedom of speech does not mean that you can’t get fired from a job for insulting customers. Freedom of religion does not mean that you can try and convert every customer that comes in the door without getting fired from your job for it. I think it’s important to realize that to demand rights, we have to respect others’ rights in their own spaces in return. That is, I believe freedom of expression must be protected on a personal and public level (in your own home, in public spaces, and in government spaces like courts and schools), but that it’s also important that others be allowed to define their own spaces2 (in their own homes and businesses, in private schools, and so on).

    There are two common myths I’d like to first dispel, starting with “body modification is a choice”. Yes, body modification is a choice to some extent, in that you’re not born with it like race. However, we’re not born with a belly full of food either, nor are we born with a mate, or the other things that are considered fundamental requirements of biological survival. If we look at human history, and even mammalian behaviour in general, it’s clear that there is some sort of “self-decorating instinct”. In puritan times, this is expressed through elegant dress or even physical exercise, but I don’t believe there’s a time in history where this instinct hasn’t been there, and I don’t believe there’s a person unaffected by it. We are after all not just a tool-using species, but a species that has thrived due to its power to communicate.

    In my research on body modification, it appears that at least ten percent of people acutely believe that their modifications are definitive of who they are, and that restricting those drives damages them as a person. My research has also found that by denying people their modifications (either by restricting access to them in the first place or by creating social pressures to force their abandonment) they are more likely to fall into depression, as well as showing a clear link between depression survival and body modification self-expression.

    These are verifiable truths. One can argue the specifics of the above of course, but as generalisations (that self-decoration is a biological instinct and that body modification can be an enormously positive self-definition and self-acceptance tool) are both difficult to refute.

    The second myth is that somehow certain mediums of expression are protected but others are not; that the Constitution3 protects the written or spoken word more so than other forms of expression. The founding fathers sought to create a nation where an individual was free to do anything they chose to, short of harming those around them — every document they created screams out for the defence of personal liberty. We accept that if a group chooses to modify their bodies for religious reasons it is protected4 but that alone raises a concern: are we saying that the faithful or spiritual are endowed with more rights than atheists? Are we saying that different religions have different rights?

    My IQ tops 160, I own a series of successful businesses, and I am well educated, yet I have come to conclusions about how I’d like to live my life that are different than those in the mainstream have come to. The reason I say that is when we step back, one of the paradoxes of human existence is that even the smartest people among us have been absolutely unable to figure out many universal truths as far as what’s acceptable behavior. So I might be wrong, or you might be wrong, or maybe we’re all wrong or all right on some level. As such it is essential that we define a socio-judicial system which tolerates as much personal freedom as possible without impinging on the needs and functionality of society as a whole. The only other alternative is for one group to force its potentially incorrect ideology on the rest of us using force.

    Three counties in Florida, along with many other areas around America and the rest of the world have banned pierced students from attending their public schools5. First of all I should make it clear that in Florida you can be pierced only with parental consent if you are underage, and if you are under 16, not only is notarised permission needed, but the parent must be present. The kids we’re discussing here are in theory pierced with the permission of both their parents and the state government.

    Recently Anna Wills, an admittedly troubled student who’d already been to juvenile court and had many problems — along with an eyebrow piercing — fell asleep in class. When Lake County school administration woke her they accused her (quite probably correctly) of being intoxicated and demanded that she submit to a urine test. She refused (given her age, they did not have the legal right to even ask — written parental consent is required for such testing), so they then simply informed her that her eyebrow piercing was a violation of school dress code and she was suspended until willing to take it out.

    When she got home, she told her father what had happened, and given that this was far from the first time she’d been in trouble, he berated her and she ran up to her room. She’d hit the end of her rope — she called a few friends, and shortly thereafter put a gun to her own head. Anna Wills has been wiped off the planet. A few weeks ago she was alive. Now she’s dead, with not even an obituary marking her troubled passing.

    Can I tell you with certainty that she killed herself for the sole reason that she wasn’t allowed to keep her eyebrow ring? Of course not. I can’t even tell you that she wouldn’t have killed herself a week later for some other reason. But what I can tell you is that she was a young person who’s life must have seemed like it was in shambles — like many young people she must have felt desperate and out of control. If she was anything like any of the hundreds of young people I’ve interviewed on this subject, her eyebrow piercing — control over her own body that is — may well have seemed like the only thing she had left. They tried to take it away, and it was too much for her.

    I called the Lake County School Board and spoke at length with Lyn Jones6, their “Safe Schools” appointee who is in charge of coordinating school policy on these subjects. She confirmed to me that ear piercings (of all kinds) were permitted for students of both genders, as well as tattoos (students with racist or otherwise questionable tattoos would be asked to cover them though), but that no other piercings were permitted. She confirmed that this also applied to piercings underneath clothing, if the school were to find out about them.

    When asked exactly why they’d instituted such a policy, she told me that it was important that the schools enact policies to ensure that the students don’t come in contact with anything “unusual or different”, since that would be extremely “disruptive” to the educational process. It’s understandable that if something is so upsetting or distracting to students that it disrupts the educational process that it should be kept out of schools — but can we really say that a simple body piercing is such a thing, especially while maintaining that a tattoo is not?

    I asked Ms. Jones whether the school board had any plans to ban particularly attractive young women from attending classes with pubescent boys, or whether they intended to set aside special classrooms to avoid the teasing and disruption that obese students receive — naturally she refused to answer my ridiculous question. But don’t write it off so quickly — if we’re to simply address things functionally, we all know that piercings rank incredibly low on the disruption charts, if at all.

    The second typical explanation was then offered — that if a student were to get in a fight that they would be at greater risk of injury if they had piercings. Ignoring the extremely disturbing comment it makes to have to enact school policy to make our children more effective street fighters, let’s quickly dispel this fallacy. First of all, one is just as likely to be injured by non-piercing related jewelry, long hair, drinking fountains, and so on. More importantly, Lake County schools do have parking lots and do allow students to drive to school. It goes without saying that driving is an activity that is probably millions of times more dangerous than piercing. In addition, like most schools, those in Lake County encourage their sports teams — in which many students have been injured, even seriously, over the years.

    Robert Van Winkle of the nearby Feelin’ Lucky Tattoo (who has been active in attending board meetings and serving as a voice for the local pierced community, as well as having pierced hundreds of young people attending Lake County schools) pointed out both to me and to the school board that by requiring students to take out piercings at the start of the school day and then returning them at day’s end, they are forcing the students to spend the day with an open wound. In his role as a professional, he informed them that this policy was actively endangering students and that if it were to continue, it would mean that the school board was knowingly engaging in child abuse. The school board held that keeping piercings out of the public schools was more important than protecting the safety of pierced students.

    This is a policy that isn’t in the best interests of the students, the teachers, or the education system in general. It is the result of a small handful of individuals attempting to force their social and political agenda on the population as a whole. It teaches profoundly repressive anti-freedom and unamerican attitudes to students. It sends students a frightening message: root out and destroy that which is unique; that diversity is to be punished, not celebrated. The founding fathers sought a land where freedom was protected, and in order to protect freedom one must tolerate a range of expression. Without that concession, freedom can not exist.

    While researching this story, I was approached by a student attending Kent State University in Akron, Ohio. As a part of their “police role” course is the requirement to participate on a ride-along with local police. This student wrote to tell me that they had been blocked from participating because of their small number of facial piercings with the reasoning that their “body piercings would endanger the officer”. I spoke with Akron Police who explained to me that while they had absolutely no problem with piercing, the students would be acting as representatives of the police department and would have to enter civilian homes among other things.

    Police work in an imperfect world. Because of the wide range of people they have to deal with, in order to do their job effectively they need to maintain an absolutely mainstream appearance. To not do so puts them in jeopardy and in turn puts the larger community in jeopardy. You may be wondering why I’d bring up a case of “discrimination” and then support it, but something I’m trying to illustrate clearly is that while body modification should be a right, it doesn’t mean that it’s always no-questions-asked permissable in all circumstances. Special cases such as the police, as well as privately held spaces can of course create their own rules — that’s the wonderful thing about freedom (everybody gets some, but no one gets it all).

    I have to apologise for being rather disjointed on this article — I’ve only just skimmed multiple topics which could each be their own book. I would like to very briefly talk to young people who may find themselves in the same position as Anna Wills did. Like Anna — and like myself — you can’t always rely on your parents to support you in this decision, as they may both not understand it, and, just as likely, may be utterly blind to its value if you have other problems.

    Strength is in numbers. A school board can expel just one poor student without raising eyebrows or having to answer many questions. The Lake County school board, according to local piercers and students has at least dozens of students with visible piercings, but only “problem students” get expelled. You might think I’m reading you the script to the movie Pump Up The Volume, but our investigations were quite clear that not only is there a general ban on piercing, but that it’s being used as a tool to get rid of students where there is no other legal reason to do so. I informed the Lake County School Board of this and they assured me that there were no visibly pierced students in their school, and that the rule was absolute and not discretionary in any way. They also informed me that any teachers not upholding these rules would be subject to disciplinary action.

    Stand together.

    If students form a petition that says “I have body piercings and I refuse to remove them” and get more than a dozen students to sign it, and submit copies of this to the school board along with a list of their teachers, the school board is immediately forced to repeal the law — they simply can not expel that many students without very solid justification, especially if even one or two parents will stand with the students.

    Finally, let me send out a stern warning to parents and school boards. Anna Wills isn’t the first student to kill herself where the demand to remove piercings acted as a trigger, and she won’t be the last. Some people feel very strongly on this subject, and you may not get “lucky” with a suicide. Next time it may be homicidal self-destruction rather than suicidal self-destruction. The line between extreme depression and extreme anger is a very fine one. Do you really want your prejudicial rule to kick-start the next Columbine massacre?

    In conclusion, I hope that I’ve illustrated that body modification is a positive act that free people have a right to pursue. In addition, I hope I’ve shown that protecting body modification (even if one disagrees with it) protects other rights and freedoms in general. Finally, I hope I’ve made clear that the current policies that are being pushed on our young people are both damaging to them personally and to society in general, and are a product not of concern for the students’ safety or education, but of personal prejudices.

    We must defend the freedom of expression as passionately as the other rights we hold dear. To suggest that freedom is somehow restricted to only certain mediums is a clear oxymoron and an insult to liberty. It’s about time we stood up and pointed that out.

    Thank you,

    shannonsig

    Shannon Larratt
    BME.com


    1
    South Carolina supports a ban on tattooing for religious reasons (with Senators like the above quoted Jakie Knotts making statements like “I just don’t believe in marking up the body that the good Lord gave you — You get me a letter from the president of the South Carolina Baptist Association endorsing [the legalisation of tattooing] and I just might change my mind.”). Tattoo artist Ron White documents his fight — which so far has given him a five year sentence and fines — on his website, www.freedomtattoo.com. In his case the prosecution successfully argued that freedom of speech does not apply to the body (although ear piercing is acceptable to them).

     

    2 Please see my earlier column, Body Modification as a Form of Class Consciousness and Class Warfare for a proposal for the modified community to fight private-sector discrimination without stomping on anyone’s rights (ie. by consumer action rather than legal action). For example, while I find it personally distasteful, I support the right of the Clemens Foundation to withdraw its private scholarship fund because it feels that the students in their town are “not the kind of people they want to support” since they are pierced and support gay rights. It is an ignorant attitude, but ultimately one must support their right to live their lives they way they choose to if we want to demand the same right.

     

    3 I use the US Constitution as a reference point as it is widely accepted as one of the defining documents of personal freedom, and because it has served as a model for the constitutions of many other nations, including Canada where BME is published from.

     

    4 The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission confirmed their support of this statement earlier this year in the case of Kimberly Cloutier vs. CostCo (Cloutier claims her eyebrow ring is an essential element of her faith).

     

    5 I want to be clear that these are public schools, not private schools. While I find it personally distasteful, I fully support a private school’s right to any dress code they want — since they are private, students can always choose a different school. It’s only an issue when it’s a public school since that forces a student to choose between their body modifications and their education, which is clearly an unreasonable decision to force on a young people.

     

    6 Lyn Jones’s office may be reached at (352) 253-6675. The next policy review period should be begin in February or March, and will be announced in local papers for 27 days. There will be meetings open to the public, and Ms. Jones has said that she welcomes comment on the subject.

     


    Next week: “Why I won’t be seeing any more Adam Sandler movies.”

     

  • Dangerous Mods, Hidden Risks [The Publisher’s Ring]

     


    Dangerous Mods, Hidden Risks

     


    "The world is but a canvas of the imagination."

    – Henry David Thoreau

     

    When you look at photos on BME, especially in BME/extreme, you’ll see some remarkable things that people have done with their bodies. You’ll see people really living out their dreams by sculpting their bodies into their wildest fantasies. But don’t think it always turns out well. Below you see a recent photo I was sent of a home-done circumcision (it is an explicit photo that may be disturbing to some readers, please view it and the other photos in this article with caution if heavy mods aren’t your thing):


     

    The body heals many remarkable things — given how rough many heavy mods (both in the “BME realm” and in plastic surgery) look fresh and healing, it wouldn’t be grasping at straws for a viewer to assume this procedure healed well and left the desired results. Unfortunately it did not. The exposed tissue became infected and hospitalisation was required. To make matters worse, the healing tissue scarred badly. Since scar tissue isn’t stretchy like normal skin, the end result was a badly scarred and dramatically shortened penis that was not able to achieve normal erection. Definitely not the desired result, and now only expensive plastic surgery can correct it.

    I could write a lengthy article about the risks — a catalogue of horrific anecdotes — part of me wanted to. But if you’ll look on the main cover of BME, you’ll see there’s a link labelled “Risks”. I think it’s important not only that people read and educate themselves, but that they realize that these are not the only risks, and that they have to use common sense and perhaps do a little research of their own before undertaking body modifications of any seriousness.

    One of the things that disturbs me in documenting risks is that if I say something like “if you get an implant on top of your hand, it will put pressure on the tendons and eventually lead to difficulty,” it’s like the old Far Side cartoon “what dogs hear”. To paraphrase,

    Human says: “Hey Rover, come here, I have a cookie for you, cummeer Rover!”
    Dog hears: “woof ROVER woof woof woof woof woof ROVER!”

    So are you a dog or a person? When you read the risks, do you see the risks, or do you just see “blah blah blah IMPLANT blah blah blah”? Because the most common response I get to showing someone risks on a given mod is “Implants?! Cool! Where can I get them?”

    Just be careful, and when looking at pictures on BME — or anywhere, including your piercer’s portfolio — view them with the following truths in mind:

    1. The mod you’re looking at may not have healed successfully. Even if it’s healed in the photo, it may have gone horribly wrong long afterwards (implants are a good example of this).
    2. The mod you’re looking at may have healed successfully on that person, but it may not heal as well on you (surface piercings and scarification are good examples of this).

    I understand that people get very excited and tend to rush ahead without really thinking about it — given the life-long-dream-finally-being-realized nature of some of these activities, that’s no surprise. With piercings and tattoos, while that’s definitely not a good idea, the amount of irreversible damage you can do to yourself is relatively limited… But when you’re talking about mods that start moving into the surgical sphere, your potential damage goes way up. A good example that I’ve seen far, far too many times is mineral oil injection (sort of a poor man’s silicone). Now let me make this very clear: injecting mineral oil under the skin of your penis is a very bad idea.

    Mineral oil is not absorbed by your body like saline is. Nor is it relatively inert like silicone is. You may have seen a fresh photo of a mineral oil injection like the one below. Sure, it looks good in that photo — but don’t make the mistake of being distracted from the bigger picture by that big fat meaty cock that you’ve been dreaming about. It’s not so fun if things go bad.


     

    Now here’s the problem. As I said, the mineral oil is neither bio-compatible nor is it absorbable. Instead, the body attempts to encapsulate it with a gigantic cascading mess of internal scar tissue. Repair is extremely difficult. Take a look at the picture below and ask yourself, “wouldn’t my life be better if I did my research?”


     

    If you want a heavy mod — hell, if you want a piercing, read the experiences, and don’t ignore the ones that describe problems. Talk to people, both practitioners and people who have the procedure. The longer ago it happened, the better, since it’ll offer a lot more perspective than you’ll get from someone who just got it a month ago. You may not be lucky — do consider the worst case scenario. Odds are it won’t happen to you, but statistically it does happen, even to people who do everything right.

    There is one very uncomfortable fact I should bring up in conclusion, and that is that not all practitioners are either trustworthy or educated. This is an unregulated industry — any joker with a scalpel can pretend to be an expert. Unless you educate yourself fully, you won’t be able to tell if your practitioner is ignoring the risks, be it because they don’t know them, or they’re “getting off” on the procedure on some level (they might get turned on by it, or they might think they’ll have their name in lights for doing a “freaky” aka dangerous and ill-advised procedure). Never just blindly assume someone knows what they’re talking about.

    I’m not saying don’t do these things: I think it’s pretty obvious that I’m in support of them. What I’m saying is do your research, be responsible, and make an informed decision. Your body is going to be with you until you leave it, and it can make you very happy if you treat it well.

    Good luck and happy modding,

    Shannon Larratt
    BME.com


    Next week: “Should freedom of expression be a right?”

     

  • Why BME Supports Self-Piercing [The Publisher’s Ring]


    Why BME supports self-piercing


    "When I am working on a problem I never think about beauty. I only think about how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong."

    – Buckminster Fuller

    BME occasionally catches flak from other sites and from the piercing industry for being an ardent supporter of people who choose to pierce themselves. Now, before we get any farther into this discussion, let me make one thing very clear: Over the past twenty years, we have evolved a talented and worthwhile piercing industry. Most urban areas have excellent quality studios, and it is almost always better for an individual to go to a studio for their piercing than it is for them to do it themselves. At a studio they not only get access to an experienced practitioner and their advice, but also to a controlled environment and quality tools.

    In addition, let’s be very clear on what BME does not support. I am not supporting self-piercing as a way to “get around” things like age laws. If someone is going to pierce themselves, it should be because they’ve determined on some level that it’s the best thing for them. Self-piercing as a “second best” option is quite obviously a bad idea. Additionally, I absolutely am not in support of people running “amateur home studios”. As soon as you have multiple people involved you start getting into cross-contamination and bio-pathogen risks that one simply can not safely control in a home environment. This is absolutely not a defence of irresponsible and reckless behaviour. If a person wants to pierce themselves, they have a duty to educate themselves and do a good job of it, and it is paramount that they not put others at risk.

    Many of my piercings are self done.

    I grew up piercing myself. I had genital piercings and genital tattoos when I was sixteen. They were most certainly safe, and, more importantly, they had a positive impact on my life. I learned something about myself, and I walked away from the experiences a better person. No one has the right to tell me that those experiences are wrong because I didn’t pay someone else to provide them for me. A sexual surrogate may well be “better at sex” than average, but you don’ t see people arguing that one should choose a surrogate over one’s partner.

    Read the self-piercing experiences on BME, especially the ones submitted by older readers, and you’ll come to a clear conclusion: on the whole, even in cases where the piercing itself was unsuccessful, people almost always walk away from the experience enriched and without real regrets. How dare we try and devalue that experience with an ignorant blanket statement of “self piercing is wrong”?

    The piercing industry is built on and by self-piercing.

    It’s a simple fact: this industry is built on self-piercing, and if it ever fades out of mainstream popularity, it is self piercing that will keep it alive. The piercing industry was formed by individuals who had all been piercing themselves, and I think it’s safe to say that the majority of older “celebrity” piercers all started by piercing themselves as well. I’m not even sure that I’d be comfortable with a piercer that hasn’t pierced themselves at least once.

    How dare we throw away all of their contributions because we have the misguided and self-aggrandising notion that because they self-pierced they are somehow the scourge of this community, rather than the founders?

    Not everyone has access to a decent piercing studio.

    While most areas in North America have a piercing studio within a forty minute drive, that’s certainly not a universal truth. Yes, even most small towns have piercing studios nowadays, but I’ve seen any number that I would never trust to pierce me. Just because a person can come up with the money to put up a sign doesn’t mean they are qualified to perform the service safely.

    In addition, people may have social reasons for not wanting to be pierced in a studio, or they may not want to have that experience in a studio. A good example are older life-partners who choose to pierce each other in a private setting. How dare we try and tell them that they don’t have that right simply because we believe that self piercing is wrong?

    BME’s role is to provide information, not to force one view.

    BME’s primary job is to document the life of the body modification community as a whole. While we clearly provide educational information in order to help the community grow in a positive direction, it would be detrimental to our purpose to attempt to silence a significant percentage of the community because we disagree with the way they did their procedures.

    How dare someone try and suggest that BME use its mass-eyeball power to try and lie about the nature of this community?

    Self-piercing will happen, independent of our statements.

    Self-piercing supplies (of varying quality) are very easy to get from numerous sources, and it’s effectively impossible to cut off easy all-ages access to these supplies. In addition, in the few cases where there isn’t access to supplies, it’s been made clear over and over and over again that people will improvise and use whatever they can find. Also, all of my educational efforts via BME have made one thing clear: people ignore warnings. No matter what dire warning I put up about the risks of a given activity, if people want to do it, they will.

    How dare we suggest that BME is wrong to provide high quality tools and comprehensive education when the alternative is poor tools and no education? What kind of monster believes that if someone is going to be self-pierced, that they’d like them to have as poor a chance of doing a good job as possible?

    It’s their right.

    Ultimately that’s what it boils down to, isn’t it? Does a person have fundamental ownership of their own body? It is my belief that if a person is of sound mind, that they are the sole owner and controller of what happens to their physical body. While I believe that as compassionate human beings we have a job to guide our neighbours into the best decision when possible, I also believe that we don’t have the right to try and take away that sovereignty.

    If, after reading all the data provided and becoming as fully educated as possible on the subject, a person makes an informed decision to pierce themselves, of course I will support them in that. How dare anyone who believes in basic human freedoms and rights try and take that away?

    So what’s wrong with self-piercing?

    As they say, “just because you can do something, doesn’t mean you should.”

    Basic piercings (ears, genitals, noses, etc.) have been done since we were cavemen. That’s right; cavemen could do it safely. The human body is quite resilient — puncture us through our outer shell and we will heal. There might be a small scar but the odds of serious injury are miniscule and largely unrelated to whether the piercing is self done or not. If a person is sticking to these piercings, then it would be almost impossible for them to get much more than a crooked piercing or a tiny dot of scar tissue.

    As far as contamination risks — I recently got an email that said “ever heard of cross contamination? don’t you know you can get AIDS from piercing yourself?” — in some ways these risks are actually reduced when self piercing. Cross contamination (of the sort that carries blood-borne pathogens) happens because of blood from another person entering your bloodstream via contaminated tools, supplies, or jewelry. If you are “outside the loop” (that is, your supplies can not come in that type of contact with people), then short of dragging dirt and dust into the piercing, you’re not going to get AIDS. I suppose there’s a minute chance that someone in the factory that made some of what you’re using has hepatitis, and that somehow their blood got on the item and survived the trip to you, but that’s such a remote chance that you’re far more likely to be hit and killed by a car on the way to the piercing studio.

    But don’t underestimate the risk that simple environmental contamination poses — a dirty piercing (that is, a piercing with dirt inside it) is far more likely to get infected and will harbour dramatically more bacteria than one where every item has been kept meticulously clean and sterile.

    As I said above, by reading the experiences on BME you can see all the good that comes from self-piercing. But don’t be blind to what is also being said — there are many mistakes made, and not all of those lessons need to be learned over and over and over.

    In Conclusion

    To summarise, I’m not saying “go pierce yourself” or that self-piercing is in any way “better”. I believe that 99% of people would be better off getting pierced at a studio. That said, I am making two very simple requests of people:

    1. Educate yourself fully and make the best decision for you.
    2. Respect other’s right to do the same.

    Thank you,

    Shannon Larratt
    BME.com


    Next week: A counter-argument… “Dangerous Mods, Hidden Risks”

  • Bod Mod and Class War [The Publisher’s Ring]

     

    This columns marks the re-introduction of a hopefully weekly piece by me, Shannon Larratt (glider). I think it’s important to note that while my views do largely represent the official stance of BME, my views by no means should be taken to represent this community as a whole. I am well known for having radikal notions on most of subjects, including body modification (and I do mean to say “radikal”, as in the political sense, not “radical” as in the surfer dude sense). With that caveat made clear, let’s begin.

    Body Modification as a Form of
    Class Consciousness and Class Warfare
     

    "A downtrodden class will never be able to make an effective protest until it achieves solidarity"

    - H.G. Wells

    No one likes to admit it, but there is a war for survival going on between those who choose to lead public modified lives, and those who believe this lifestyle is wrong. In this article I will attempt to show how this war is being fought, and will propose plans of counterattack that strengthen our collective stance without alienating the generally neutral mainstream population.

    First of all, it’s important to differentiate between attacks coming from the private sector (individuals and private businesses) and the attacks coming from the public sector (generally municipal and state government actions). While in the private sector there is a certain balance of rights (for example, the balance between a person’s right to free expression contrasted with a private company’s right to impose a code of behaviour on its workplace and employees), but in the public sector the balance must be far more liberal as the services provided are in general both monopolistic and universal, and because they are paid for by all (including the modified), morally they must be accessible by all.

    I’d like to address the public sector attacks first. While I’m not proposing that there’s a unified conspiracy throughout the government opposed to body modification, closed-minded and backward-thinking individuals voted into power can use the strength of the government to attack us primarily via educational restrictions (which attack young people interested in pursuing body modification), although business restrictions (which attempt to close down or restrict from opening body modification studios) and subsequent related prosecutions occur to a lesser extent.

    If a state institutes a policy of banning body modifications (generally piercings) in schools, they leave “young modders” with an unpleasant choice: cease to exist as modified people, or be expelled from the school system to fend in the world without an education1. To take away someone’s basic right to an education over a piercing or tattoo makes a powerful statement: the government viewpoint is that we do not in fact own our bodies or have authority over them, and that the government holds the sole rights to dictate what happens to your body. Additionally, it makes the statement that body modification is so wrong that a person who has committed the sin of body piercing does not deserve to have an education due to the level of danger (presumably via moral corruption) they present to other students. Both are of course patently ridiculous propositions and impossible to defend in any logical debate.

    If a state institutes a policy of interfering with the business of body modification, either by malicious zoning and regulation2, or by an outright ban3, they attempt to kill body modification at its source. This type of attack has the end effect of putting out of business reputable high-quality studios and forcing customers into the hands of far less reputable fly-by-night studios4. The government is perfectly aware that acts like this serve not only to reduce the number of modified people in their community, but also to injure and put at risk those that remain.

    I hope that short introduction clarifies that elements of the government are very much at war with the modified community, and that they are willing to both exterminate us and when not able, injure us as much as possible. It is no surprise that similar bigotry exists in the private sector as well. Every one of us has experienced a range of attacks from very minor (rudeness and bad service) to more severe (restriction of access to the job market, poor or even dangerous medical and professional service, and so on)5.

    Minor and individually launched attacks, while unacceptable and boorish, fluctuate with the whims and perceived norms of the moment, and I believe will largely disappear in time as the practise of body modification becomes more normal and visible — I don’t believe the average person has a problem with us. The difficulty is that more powerful forces in the private sector are doing what they can to ensure that this community doesn’t grow in any space they control. The primary methods in use are the restriction of access to employment, as well as misleading and sometimes fraudulent statements made by professional and semi-official organisations such as medical fraternities and “public interest” groups6.

    Businesses of course can and should dictate how their employees look and dress. In general this is done in the best interests of the business and to a lesser extent the customer (by instituting policies that give the business a unified look, ensuring employee safety, or increasing customer comfort), but in many cases do not aid the business itself and serves primarily to further the personal bias of the business owner, to the detriment of both the employees and the public — I hold that any act which attempts to restrict consensual activities which do no harm to others takes away from the validity of a free society. When individuals or corporations use their power to attempt to do economic harm to people who’ve chosen to modify their bodies, they are doing what they can to wage war on this community.

    I’ve used the term “freedom of expression” a few times — I think it’s important to note that this is not a legal right in the same way as free speech and free religion are. While some hold that body modification is a religion (I certainly concede that it has many spiritual aspects, and even on a minor level is an essential and life changing act for many people7), I do not believe that anyone would claim that this is a universal statement8. So the private sector attacks I’ve described above are perfectly legal on the whole. Unethical and disgusting, yes, but unfortunately also quite acceptable to the judicial system — and to be honest, as much as I’d like to have what I believe are fundamental rights forced through, if we believe in democracy and the general goodness of people, this can be solved without unpleasant legal confrontation.

    So how do we fight this? How do we peacefully show them that we can make their lives better, and that they should want us to take part in the system?

    I believe both in the general goodness of people, and in our government’s general system of representing the needs of its population — although it is clear that it often lags behind in reforming questionable policies and there are times when politicians are more concerned with their personal ignorance and prejudices than the needs of their constituents. I believe that if body modification is “right”, that by exercising our democratic voices, both as voters and as consumers, that we can “prove” ourselves. I also believe that if we can not use this system to prove ourselves, that it shows they are in the right9.

    The simple fact is that there are a lot of us. It is difficult to get exact statistics, but studies show that about 18% of college students have tattoos (up from about 10% in 1997)10. Employment studies by Vault.com showed that about 20% of the general working population says that their tattoos or piercings have hindered their progress in the job market11. Certain demographic groups show higher numbers; for example, a full third of those involved in computer gaming have piercings and tattoos. Whatever the precise number is, it’s clear that it’s a giagantic group — most likely approximately one in five people12. For comparison, that means there twice as many people with piercings and tattoos in America as their are African Americans or Hispanics13. In addition, when we compare the growth rate of the modified community, we are growing at a rate dramatically faster than any other demographic group14.

    Because there are a lot of us, our strength and victory can come through co-operative organisation, community strength, and grassroots action — not through confrontational legal action which works to alienate and frighten those who don’t understand us. Now let’s outline how we can win this battle. We need to send the message that if they don’t want to play nice, we’re not going to play their game, and we need to send the message that they are better off with us in the system.

    The vast majority of people don’t mind what other do to their bodies, but they do suffer from both fear and ignorance, with flames fanned by misleading statements issued by groups such as the American Dental Association15 which are then transformed into flat-out fraudulent statements by irresponsible journalists16. As such, we need to be vigilant and responsible in dispelling these myths through even-handed public information campaigns of our own, along with ensuring that members of our community behave responsibly and safely when interacting with the general public, so as not to provide ammunition against ourselves.

    As soon as a person has body modifications that are public — facial piercings, tattoos on public skin, and so on — they become aware of the class line. While we are of course fundamentally the same, it really is “us” and “them”, even though this line should be absolutely illusionary and inconsequential. Because the general public has been so effectively conditioned to believe there’s something wrong with modified people, we get treated poorly and receive inadequate service17. Now, what’s very important here is that the modified community not play into and confirm the stereotype.

    That is, if someone is rude to you because of your piercings, in their mind, you started it. Which means that if you respond rudely, in their mind you came in to their place of work and abused them. They will not realize that what they did is wrong in any way. Politely leave, but first make sure that a manager is informed that you were displeased with the service and how you have been made to feel. If the manager does not adequately conclude the encounter, I would strongly encourage you to write a letter to the corporate offices (I have attached sample letters at the end of this article). But please do not ignore the advice of first turning the other cheek and attempting to resolve the confrontation with kindless and polite manners. Don’t be surprised if by doing that you shatter that person’s misconceptions and make life more pleasant for the next modified person.

    In any case, the fact is that businesses, especially large businesses, operate on very slim profit margins. A single percentage point drop in their sales is enough to destabilise their business model. Again, it’s very important to note that there are a lot of us, and if we work together we have enormous financial and social power. I’m not suggesting any far out goals or special recognition or special rights — I’m simply saying that we have the right and the power to demand and get “fair and equal treatment”.

    If you are turned down for a job, or fired from a job for piercings or tattoos, the simplest way to remedy the situation is to use your voice. Fighting it in court is generally a losing battle, and will eat up your time and money. On the other hand, telling everyone you know what happened to you, and urging them to not support this business until they remedy the situation is free, ethical, very effective and most importantly sends a clear message.

    I realize that I am about to ask you to accept some self imposed hardship, but unless it’s utterly necessary, please do not tell them that you’re willing to compromise and take out or hide your body modifications. When that happens, it lets them know that they can push us around, and that expressing who we are means less to us that $6.50 an hour. To achieve this liberty, it’s important that a modified person with uncertain job prospects live light financially and try and keep enough buffer cash to avoid becoming an optionless and powerless wage slave. In addition, it is doubly important that the network of modified people support each other through job contacts, boycotts, and so on. If every time a modified person is denied service or a job by a business, the modified community makes it clear that they’ve just lost a significant percentage of their customer base, the practise will end quickly and peacefully (whereas if we try and fight it using other means, the practise will continue and grow, and if we lose, it will become very clearly legalised).

    The government is more difficult to fight because it can not be intimidated by the threat of consumer actions and there may not be alternate services (which gives them the power to dictate nearly any condition they want without leaving other options), and in addition the majority of government attacks are on underage individuals who don’t typically have the power or experience to fight back. As such there are two very important conditions that should be met before attempting to fight this. First of all, the student should not have any major weaknesses — it is far easier to fight if they have average or above average grades, don’t have a disciplinary problems, and are well liked by their peers and hopefully teachers. Second of all, the student should have the active support of their peers and family.

    A school can usually get away with quietly kicking out a single student — so refuse to take out your piercings, and make sure your friends do the same, and make sure that your parents support you on the whole. A school can not kick out a dozen or more students for piercings and tattoos, especially solid student with parental support. That’s all it takes to make those policies end almost overnight: solidarity of the modified.

    To recap and summarise, they attack us by restricting our access to essential services and by attempting to ban our activities. We can combat that by being productive and positive members of society, while still refusing to bend to their will, and supporting each other through the tough times that sometimes get forced on us. By exercising the power we have due to our numbers, and refusing to take part in their system when it treats us unfairly, we can show them that they will be happier and successful with us than without us18.

    All we have to do is stand together, and we will win.

    Thank you,

    Shannon Larratt.

     


    Endnotes1 Over the past five years an increasing number of school boards are including bans on body piercing and dyed hair in their dress code rules. These rules are generally retroactive (that is, the student is forced to remove their piercings and un-dye their hair). It is important to note that these rules are not passed for the safety or benefit of the student, but instead to attempt to force the social morals of a minority on the student body. There are a number of personal stories about this in the editorials section of BME/News, and an Internet search on the subject will turn up numerous examples. Sadly this is not unusual, at least not in North America.

    2 Most cities have zoning laws written specifically to set rules for piercing and tattoo studies. These laws restrict the opening of studies and often restrict them to ghettos outside of key business districts. As well as restricting the business’s right to compete fairly in the market, this sends the message that tattooing and piercing is “beneath the mainstream” and that it doesn’t have the right to be in the same area. In addition, it is not unusual for zoning boards to try and push existing businesses out. As a point of morbid trivia, New York City’s vote to re-ban tattooing was terminated by the September 11th attacks.

    3 A number of states still maintain state-wide bans on the art form of tattooing. Anyone tattooing in these states faces immediate arrest and imprisonment. Recent court challenges to this law have made tattooing the only art form not protected by the first ammendment.

    4 My submissions numbers at BME are very clear — piercing and tattooing reaches all demographics and geographies. Laws banning the practise simply pushes it out of the public eye, with an end result of lower quality service to the client.

    5 One of the first things a person notices when they get their first public modifications is people’s eyes. We are very good at catching what people are looking at — all animals are; it’s a survival skill. I doubt there’s a single person with public mods who’s never suffered from this. Yes, we knew it would happen when we went down this path, but that doesn’t make it right.

    6 Again, I’m not trying to imply some grand conspiracy. I’m talking about a “trend” or “swarm” of action committed by misguided individuals in positions of power. However, all those actions brought together do represent a somewhat unified wave of attack on us.

    7 Read the experiences in BME, especially in the ritual section, but also in every section, and it will become immediately clear how profoundly life-changing even fairly innocuous body modification and body ritual acts can be.

    8 My polls suggest that approximately 5% of the body modification community holds that for them all forms of body modification are literally of religious purpose (and therefore theoretically already constitutionally protected in most Western countries).

    9 If one agrees that a democratic system can effectively reach conclusions that are what is best for society, then one must use that system to initiate societal change (rather than attempting to strong-arm it through).

    10 Statistics on college students vary a great deal from study to study, with many showing numbers far greater than the 20% range. I have chosen the lower number in order to make a “worst case” number, and I have focused on college students because they are most definitely representative of skilled young people entering the workforce with a large enough skill set to have some freedom in the job market. In addition, college students tend to have the social awareness coupled with financial empowerment that makes being an activist easier.

    11 While this is how the study was presented, I believe this may in fact mean “20% of pierced and tattooed people have experienced discrimination”. Either case is unacceptable. The study goes on to say that over two thirds of employers state that they have discriminated against potential employees with visible body modification.

    12 BME’s usage statistics dwarf many other mainstream magazines. According to Lycos, the word “tattoo” was the fourth most popular search term — of all subjects — in 2001.

    13 The African American and Hispanic communities both make up about 11% of the US population.

    14 BME’s usage statistics have continued to ramp up faster than Internet growth, consistently since opening. In addition, the piercing and tattoo industry has continued to grow every year since the 1970s.

    15 It is not unusual for groups such as the ADA to issue misleading public warnings about the dangers of piercing. While tongue piercings definitely do cause problems from time to time from chipped teeth (which can be minimised through proper jewelry), risks such as “infection leading to brain abscess” are so rare that to bring them up instead of the real risks is clear fear-mongering intended to damage the industry. The medical professionals making these statements are well educated and should be perfectly aware of the deception they are perpetrating and the effects it will have. IAM members can click here to see a letter I wrote to a newspaper on the subject.

    16 A recent example that became national news was the study linking tattoos and piercings to “troubled teens”. While early stories were clear that this was a study of 200 students at a military school, most of whom at been pierced illegally, subsequent articles stated only the size of the entire study (about 5000 students) which had nothing to do with the actual number of pierced students (only 200). This story was repeated internationally in its misleading form, and most certainly influenced the attitudes of parents and legislators. IAM members can click here to see a letter I wrote to one of the news wires on the subject.

    17 My polls indicate that effectively 100% of people with public body modifications have had these experiences.

    18 Let me be clear about something: while right now it is “us and them”, I hope that one day it will simply be “us”. Other than the fact that we on some levels are more self-aware and free, modified and unmodified people are not particularly different. Our goal should be to equalise the rights and treatments of the two groups. Not to achieve special rights or separation, but simply to coexist in a fair and equal manner.


    Sample Letters
    To a business which provided poor service:

    To whom it may concern, On March 21st, 2002 at about 2 PM I was shopping at the Queen and Bathurst location of “Bob’s Books” in Toronto for what would have been about a $75 purchase. I am a person with visible piercings and tattoos, things which I believe have enhanced my enjoyment of life, and I consider personally essential. Your employees in the reference section avoided me and made it quite clear that they had a problem with my appearance. I brought this up with the manager at the time who dismissed my concerns as baseless.

    I understand that not everyone sympathises with piercings and tattoos, but I was civil and polite in your store and I do not believe it was asking too much to simply be treated decently in return. I hope that this was an isolated incident but please realize that it reflects very poorly on your corporation and it cost you a good sale and more in the future. You should know that pierced and tattooed people now make up approximately twenty percent of the consumer base in this country.

    This pierced and tattooed person will no longer be shopping at “Bob’s Books” and I have brought up this issue both with my friends and associates as well as on public message boards in the pierced and tattooed community. I hope that this situation does not repeat itself and is brought to a hasty conclusion.

    Sincerely,
    Joe Frapster
    Proud to be pierced and tattooed

    To a school which has threatened expulsion to modified students:

    To the Maples County school board, I am a student at Maples County High School. I have maintained an above average GPA for my last three years there, and have never had disciplinary problems of any kind. That said, your recently enacted “no piercings” policy concerns me greatly as I have a septum ring and a tongue piercing, both of which are very important to me.

    Piercing has helped me grow as an individual, has made me more confident, and I believe is sincerely beneficial to me without being harmful to anyone. While I appreciate that some of you may find it distasteful or have concerns, one of the things that makes our country great is our right to express ourselves freely as long as we aren’t taking away someone else’s rights. The school system is an extension of this system (rather than being a private company), and as such has a responsibility to uphold these rights.

    I hope that you will reconsider this discriminatory policy and allow the pierced students of Maple County High to continue receiving an education. There are over forty students in this year’s graduating class with piercings and tattoos and I believe it would reflect very poorly on this school and this county if we were to be publicly denied an education simply because you don’t like the way we look.

    Removing our piercings is not an option we are willing to consider, and while we hold that it is unjust, we are willing to stand up for what we believe in and be expelled if you genuinely believe that such a severe punishment is really appropriate for our perfectly legal and non-disruptive behaviour.

    Sincerely,
    Jack Went
    Proud pierced and tattooed student

    Cosigned,
    Marla Went
    Pround parent of a pierced and tattooed son

    To a business which has anti-mod hiring practises:

    To whom it may concern, On October 2nd, 2002 at about 11 AM I was interviewed for the job of clerk at your Bay and Bloor location by Robert Pordle. I am a person with several piercings and tattoos, including a small ring in my eyebrow and a star tattoo on my wrist. I was informed that if I wanted this job I would be required to take out my eyebrow piercing and cover up my wrist tattoo.

    I feel that my body modifications are an essential part of my life and that if I were to concede in taking them out, it would be detrimental to my growth as a person. I understand that not everyone sympathises with piercings and tattoos, and I certainly support your right as an employer to dictate the appearance of your employees. However, I am more than qualified for the job, and I feel it is unfair to deny me the chance to try over something that is beneficial to me and harmless to others.

    It is important that you recognise that pierced and tattooed people now make up approximately twenty percent of the consumer and employee base in this country. By alienating us, and by making it clear that you are unwilling to employ us, you risk losing the consumer support of that consumer base.

    This pierced and tattooed person will no longer be shopping at “Lord of Lamps” and I have brought up this issue both with my friends and associates as well as on public message boards in the pierced and tattooed community. I hope you will reconsider this discriminatory policy and I hope you will bring it to a hasty and mutually beneficial conclusion by fairly considering the merits of employees independent of how they choose to decorate their bodies.

    Sincerely,
    Frank Destad
    Proud to be pierced and tattooed

     

     

Latest Tattoo, Piercing, and Body Modification News