A pictures worth a thousand words, so I will let this picture speak for itself.
This picture was submitted by lucyneckface, who credits the artist as Julian Wildhack Poyser.
Tattoo, Piercing, and Body Modification News, Events, and Culture
Written by
A pictures worth a thousand words, so I will let this picture speak for itself.
This picture was submitted by lucyneckface, who credits the artist as Julian Wildhack Poyser.
Comments
384 responses to “She’s a squirter!”
I draw blood for my living. The tourniquet is why the blood is squirting. That why when you get your blood drawn they always take the tourniquet off before removing the needle. If you don’t which I know blood will just squirt out . And I can tell you it is the ac vein that she is using the most common place to get blood. The arteries is on the side of the arm and you will feel a pulse and would not even needs a tourniquet as the blood will pulse out of there. As far as blood loss your body can make a pint a day.
I draw blood for my living. The tourniquet is why the blood is squirting. That why when you get your blood drawn they always take the tourniquet off before removing the needle. If you don’t which I know blood will just squirt out . And I can tell you it is the ac vein that she is using the most common place to get blood. The arteries is on the side of the arm and you will feel a pulse and would not even needs a tourniquet as the blood will pulse out of there. As far as blood loss your body can make a pint a day.
I draw blood for my living. The tourniquet is why the blood is squirting. That why when you get your blood drawn they always take the tourniquet off before removing the needle. If you don’t which I know blood will just squirt out . And I can tell you it is the ac vein that she is using the most common place to get blood. The arteries is on the side of the arm and you will feel a pulse and would not even needs a tourniquet as the blood will pulse out of there. As far as blood loss your body can make a pint a day.
I draw blood for my living. The tourniquet is why the blood is squirting. That why when you get your blood drawn they always take the tourniquet off before removing the needle. If you don’t which I know blood will just squirt out . And I can tell you it is the ac vein that she is using the most common place to get blood. The arteries is on the side of the arm and you will feel a pulse and would not even needs a tourniquet as the blood will pulse out of there. As far as blood loss your body can make a pint a day.
“Just trying to keep people SAFE”
Thats it. You try to keep THEM safe. “Them” had to learn about their safety themselfs. But today people are held stupid and with putting a safetywarning on everything nobody needs to think for theirself.
You said “I think most of the people getting pissy about the other people wanting disclaimers of some sort practice bloodplay themselves.”
Damn NO. I`no´t into it, but i am adult enough to decide, if i want to wear a helmet while surfing.
I am father of two children (15 and 17years old) and i know, that an normal adolescent knows what is harmfull an what is not. If an non adult visits the internet, parents had to teach them wich sites the are allowed to visit an wich not. Or the habe to control them. Thats the way it should be.
My kids would never try something like that, becaus they´re not dumb enough not to know thats its risky.
And if someone is so stupid to try something only because someone else did it on internet : Darwin will help…not them…us…lol
But hey…the trend is like “We must put an warning on everthing” (cause we like the way stupidy makes them controllable…)
People are so bad in thinking, that they need a warning on a coffee-cup, a warning that they cant leave the stearingwheel even if the tempomat is “on” and a warning, that microwave dries the cat more that they want….
But…you only want to “keep them safe”
Thank you for the generous adoption…..
“Just trying to keep people SAFE”
Thats it. You try to keep THEM safe. “Them” had to learn about their safety themselfs. But today people are held stupid and with putting a safetywarning on everything nobody needs to think for theirself.
You said “I think most of the people getting pissy about the other people wanting disclaimers of some sort practice bloodplay themselves.”
Damn NO. I`no´t into it, but i am adult enough to decide, if i want to wear a helmet while surfing.
I am father of two children (15 and 17years old) and i know, that an normal adolescent knows what is harmfull an what is not. If an non adult visits the internet, parents had to teach them wich sites the are allowed to visit an wich not. Or the habe to control them. Thats the way it should be.
My kids would never try something like that, becaus they´re not dumb enough not to know thats its risky.
And if someone is so stupid to try something only because someone else did it on internet : Darwin will help…not them…us…lol
But hey…the trend is like “We must put an warning on everthing” (cause we like the way stupidy makes them controllable…)
People are so bad in thinking, that they need a warning on a coffee-cup, a warning that they cant leave the stearingwheel even if the tempomat is “on” and a warning, that microwave dries the cat more that they want….
But…you only want to “keep them safe”
Thank you for the generous adoption…..
“Just trying to keep people SAFE”
Thats it. You try to keep THEM safe. “Them” had to learn about their safety themselfs. But today people are held stupid and with putting a safetywarning on everything nobody needs to think for theirself.
You said “I think most of the people getting pissy about the other people wanting disclaimers of some sort practice bloodplay themselves.”
Damn NO. I`no´t into it, but i am adult enough to decide, if i want to wear a helmet while surfing.
I am father of two children (15 and 17years old) and i know, that an normal adolescent knows what is harmfull an what is not. If an non adult visits the internet, parents had to teach them wich sites the are allowed to visit an wich not. Or the habe to control them. Thats the way it should be.
My kids would never try something like that, becaus they´re not dumb enough not to know thats its risky.
And if someone is so stupid to try something only because someone else did it on internet : Darwin will help…not them…us…lol
But hey…the trend is like “We must put an warning on everthing” (cause we like the way stupidy makes them controllable…)
People are so bad in thinking, that they need a warning on a coffee-cup, a warning that they cant leave the stearingwheel even if the tempomat is “on” and a warning, that microwave dries the cat more that they want….
But…you only want to “keep them safe”
Thank you for the generous adoption…..
“Just trying to keep people SAFE”
Thats it. You try to keep THEM safe. “Them” had to learn about their safety themselfs. But today people are held stupid and with putting a safetywarning on everything nobody needs to think for theirself.
You said “I think most of the people getting pissy about the other people wanting disclaimers of some sort practice bloodplay themselves.”
Damn NO. I`no´t into it, but i am adult enough to decide, if i want to wear a helmet while surfing.
I am father of two children (15 and 17years old) and i know, that an normal adolescent knows what is harmfull an what is not. If an non adult visits the internet, parents had to teach them wich sites the are allowed to visit an wich not. Or the habe to control them. Thats the way it should be.
My kids would never try something like that, becaus they´re not dumb enough not to know thats its risky.
And if someone is so stupid to try something only because someone else did it on internet : Darwin will help…not them…us…lol
But hey…the trend is like “We must put an warning on everthing” (cause we like the way stupidy makes them controllable…)
People are so bad in thinking, that they need a warning on a coffee-cup, a warning that they cant leave the stearingwheel even if the tempomat is “on” and a warning, that microwave dries the cat more that they want….
But…you only want to “keep them safe”
Thank you for the generous adoption…..
I realize everyone is an idiot and everyone needs warnings. I’m not saying put a warning on every single post, either. If a simple sentence ‘Don’t try this at home unless you fucking know what you’re doing’ is all that is needed, I don’t see why it’s such a big deal to take 5 seconds out of someone’s precious time to include it in a post like this, that doesn’t explain anything about the picture AT ALL. other than ‘she’s a squirter’.
I realize everyone is an idiot and everyone needs warnings. I’m not saying put a warning on every single post, either. If a simple sentence ‘Don’t try this at home unless you fucking know what you’re doing’ is all that is needed, I don’t see why it’s such a big deal to take 5 seconds out of someone’s precious time to include it in a post like this, that doesn’t explain anything about the picture AT ALL. other than ‘she’s a squirter’.
I realize everyone is an idiot and everyone needs warnings. I’m not saying put a warning on every single post, either. If a simple sentence ‘Don’t try this at home unless you fucking know what you’re doing’ is all that is needed, I don’t see why it’s such a big deal to take 5 seconds out of someone’s precious time to include it in a post like this, that doesn’t explain anything about the picture AT ALL. other than ‘she’s a squirter’.
I realize everyone is an idiot and everyone needs warnings. I’m not saying put a warning on every single post, either. If a simple sentence ‘Don’t try this at home unless you fucking know what you’re doing’ is all that is needed, I don’t see why it’s such a big deal to take 5 seconds out of someone’s precious time to include it in a post like this, that doesn’t explain anything about the picture AT ALL. other than ‘she’s a squirter’.
And yes I notice the tag, but my point is: not everyone does. It’s those that don’t know better that I’m worried about. Fuck me for caring.
And yes I notice the tag, but my point is: not everyone does. It’s those that don’t know better that I’m worried about. Fuck me for caring.
And yes I notice the tag, but my point is: not everyone does. It’s those that don’t know better that I’m worried about. Fuck me for caring.
And yes I notice the tag, but my point is: not everyone does. It’s those that don’t know better that I’m worried about. Fuck me for caring.
i understand it’s all about sensation, but it is a terrible waste of blood
i understand it’s all about sensation, but it is a terrible waste of blood
i understand it’s all about sensation, but it is a terrible waste of blood
i understand it’s all about sensation, but it is a terrible waste of blood
Maybe its my fault when i think that “‘Don’t try this at home unless you fucking know what you’re doing’” is something you learn in general 😉
Maybe its my fault when i think that “‘Don’t try this at home unless you fucking know what you’re doing’” is something you learn in general 😉
Maybe its my fault when i think that “‘Don’t try this at home unless you fucking know what you’re doing’” is something you learn in general 😉
Maybe its my fault when i think that “‘Don’t try this at home unless you fucking know what you’re doing’” is something you learn in general 😉
Last I checked, BME wasn’t about being as shocking as possible. What about those that actually have an interest in blood play? Obviously they aren’t going to just blindly shove objects in their veins, but aren’t they entitled to comprehensive information about the ritual? This is where they’re supposed to get it, after all…
Last I checked, BME wasn’t about being as shocking as possible. What about those that actually have an interest in blood play? Obviously they aren’t going to just blindly shove objects in their veins, but aren’t they entitled to comprehensive information about the ritual? This is where they’re supposed to get it, after all…
Last I checked, BME wasn’t about being as shocking as possible. What about those that actually have an interest in blood play? Obviously they aren’t going to just blindly shove objects in their veins, but aren’t they entitled to comprehensive information about the ritual? This is where they’re supposed to get it, after all…
Last I checked, BME wasn’t about being as shocking as possible. What about those that actually have an interest in blood play? Obviously they aren’t going to just blindly shove objects in their veins, but aren’t they entitled to comprehensive information about the ritual? This is where they’re supposed to get it, after all…
Yo V (#57) i could not agree with you more! You said what my brain said when i saw the pic.
The only way i could put my mind at ease and actually embrace the enjoyment that may be in this picture, would be if someone who specilises in human behaviour acknowledged that this act is in no way linked to the depression/emotions that causes her to self harm.
But then you would have to analyse every modification done. Not everyone shows their sadness on their arms and lots of people getted modded to “feel better”.
Also if self harm gave her the expierience to find happiness with blood play (elliminating the fear of blood loss or pain) therefor helping in create this amazing crimson arch and she no longer harms, isnt that positive, strong and beautiful?
But then if she does still self harm to find furfillment of a different nature BUT related, then is it no longer beutiful but an exploitation of sadness? An encouragement of self destructive behaviour? Or why should people who do keep their scars hidden not be subjected to such analysis of acceptable expression? If i saw a modified girl with no self harm scars im sure i would be less subjective. = shallow mind, easier to embrace?
This picture definently has impact, i feel like atrayu from the never ending story looking in the mirror at my true self, do i appreciate the beauty without a second thought or do i empathize with possible trauma that has lead to this expression…
Yo V (#57) i could not agree with you more! You said what my brain said when i saw the pic.
The only way i could put my mind at ease and actually embrace the enjoyment that may be in this picture, would be if someone who specilises in human behaviour acknowledged that this act is in no way linked to the depression/emotions that causes her to self harm.
But then you would have to analyse every modification done. Not everyone shows their sadness on their arms and lots of people getted modded to “feel better”.
Also if self harm gave her the expierience to find happiness with blood play (elliminating the fear of blood loss or pain) therefor helping in create this amazing crimson arch and she no longer harms, isnt that positive, strong and beautiful?
But then if she does still self harm to find furfillment of a different nature BUT related, then is it no longer beutiful but an exploitation of sadness? An encouragement of self destructive behaviour? Or why should people who do keep their scars hidden not be subjected to such analysis of acceptable expression? If i saw a modified girl with no self harm scars im sure i would be less subjective. = shallow mind, easier to embrace?
This picture definently has impact, i feel like atrayu from the never ending story looking in the mirror at my true self, do i appreciate the beauty without a second thought or do i empathize with possible trauma that has lead to this expression…
Yo V (#57) i could not agree with you more! You said what my brain said when i saw the pic.
The only way i could put my mind at ease and actually embrace the enjoyment that may be in this picture, would be if someone who specilises in human behaviour acknowledged that this act is in no way linked to the depression/emotions that causes her to self harm.
But then you would have to analyse every modification done. Not everyone shows their sadness on their arms and lots of people getted modded to “feel better”.
Also if self harm gave her the expierience to find happiness with blood play (elliminating the fear of blood loss or pain) therefor helping in create this amazing crimson arch and she no longer harms, isnt that positive, strong and beautiful?
But then if she does still self harm to find furfillment of a different nature BUT related, then is it no longer beutiful but an exploitation of sadness? An encouragement of self destructive behaviour? Or why should people who do keep their scars hidden not be subjected to such analysis of acceptable expression? If i saw a modified girl with no self harm scars im sure i would be less subjective. = shallow mind, easier to embrace?
This picture definently has impact, i feel like atrayu from the never ending story looking in the mirror at my true self, do i appreciate the beauty without a second thought or do i empathize with possible trauma that has lead to this expression…
Yo V (#57) i could not agree with you more! You said what my brain said when i saw the pic.
The only way i could put my mind at ease and actually embrace the enjoyment that may be in this picture, would be if someone who specilises in human behaviour acknowledged that this act is in no way linked to the depression/emotions that causes her to self harm.
But then you would have to analyse every modification done. Not everyone shows their sadness on their arms and lots of people getted modded to “feel better”.
Also if self harm gave her the expierience to find happiness with blood play (elliminating the fear of blood loss or pain) therefor helping in create this amazing crimson arch and she no longer harms, isnt that positive, strong and beautiful?
But then if she does still self harm to find furfillment of a different nature BUT related, then is it no longer beutiful but an exploitation of sadness? An encouragement of self destructive behaviour? Or why should people who do keep their scars hidden not be subjected to such analysis of acceptable expression? If i saw a modified girl with no self harm scars im sure i would be less subjective. = shallow mind, easier to embrace?
This picture definently has impact, i feel like atrayu from the never ending story looking in the mirror at my true self, do i appreciate the beauty without a second thought or do i empathize with possible trauma that has lead to this expression…
@76, i draw blood every day at work also, and I’ve never seen blood spurt like that, even when leaving the tourniquet on. Sure, you’ll bleed pretty quickly if you leave it on, but not like that. If you look at the blood pattern on the wall you can see that there were at least 2 pulses of blood before the spray captured in the photo, which is typical for arterial bleeding.
@76, i draw blood every day at work also, and I’ve never seen blood spurt like that, even when leaving the tourniquet on. Sure, you’ll bleed pretty quickly if you leave it on, but not like that. If you look at the blood pattern on the wall you can see that there were at least 2 pulses of blood before the spray captured in the photo, which is typical for arterial bleeding.
@76, i draw blood every day at work also, and I’ve never seen blood spurt like that, even when leaving the tourniquet on. Sure, you’ll bleed pretty quickly if you leave it on, but not like that. If you look at the blood pattern on the wall you can see that there were at least 2 pulses of blood before the spray captured in the photo, which is typical for arterial bleeding.
@76, i draw blood every day at work also, and I’ve never seen blood spurt like that, even when leaving the tourniquet on. Sure, you’ll bleed pretty quickly if you leave it on, but not like that. If you look at the blood pattern on the wall you can see that there were at least 2 pulses of blood before the spray captured in the photo, which is typical for arterial bleeding.
Wow! I cant believe how many misinformed people have gone out of their way to comment on this. Anatomy 101 guys: YES, you absolutely can get spray like that from a vein. Anyone who thinks you can’t is wrong! I have done this many, many times from veins and got the lovely fountain effect. Sometimes it can just dribble out and sometimes it shoots out with quite a bit of force. depends on the vein and how well you hit it. If you’ve tried this once or twice and didnt get the fountain just keep trying. Also arteries are located under a lot of soft tissue just above the bone, what you see through your skin are veins, not arteries. You seriously probably couldn’t hit an artery with a needle without medical training. Unless you have a blood disorder you couldn’t die from this even if you were trying. Even if you leave the tourniquet on and the needle in your body will stop the bleeding. Everything I just said comes from personal experience, leave ur guesses at home guys!
Also you can see the blood coming out in what appears to be a steady stream which would indicate a vein, not an artery. Arterial spray comes in burst. So, so many commentator fails on this post. FAILZORZ, guys, FAILZORZ
Wow! I cant believe how many misinformed people have gone out of their way to comment on this. Anatomy 101 guys: YES, you absolutely can get spray like that from a vein. Anyone who thinks you can’t is wrong! I have done this many, many times from veins and got the lovely fountain effect. Sometimes it can just dribble out and sometimes it shoots out with quite a bit of force. depends on the vein and how well you hit it. If you’ve tried this once or twice and didnt get the fountain just keep trying. Also arteries are located under a lot of soft tissue just above the bone, what you see through your skin are veins, not arteries. You seriously probably couldn’t hit an artery with a needle without medical training. Unless you have a blood disorder you couldn’t die from this even if you were trying. Even if you leave the tourniquet on and the needle in your body will stop the bleeding. Everything I just said comes from personal experience, leave ur guesses at home guys!
Also you can see the blood coming out in what appears to be a steady stream which would indicate a vein, not an artery. Arterial spray comes in burst. So, so many commentator fails on this post. FAILZORZ, guys, FAILZORZ
Wow! I cant believe how many misinformed people have gone out of their way to comment on this. Anatomy 101 guys: YES, you absolutely can get spray like that from a vein. Anyone who thinks you can’t is wrong! I have done this many, many times from veins and got the lovely fountain effect. Sometimes it can just dribble out and sometimes it shoots out with quite a bit of force. depends on the vein and how well you hit it. If you’ve tried this once or twice and didnt get the fountain just keep trying. Also arteries are located under a lot of soft tissue just above the bone, what you see through your skin are veins, not arteries. You seriously probably couldn’t hit an artery with a needle without medical training. Unless you have a blood disorder you couldn’t die from this even if you were trying. Even if you leave the tourniquet on and the needle in your body will stop the bleeding. Everything I just said comes from personal experience, leave ur guesses at home guys!
Also you can see the blood coming out in what appears to be a steady stream which would indicate a vein, not an artery. Arterial spray comes in burst. So, so many commentator fails on this post. FAILZORZ, guys, FAILZORZ
Wow! I cant believe how many misinformed people have gone out of their way to comment on this. Anatomy 101 guys: YES, you absolutely can get spray like that from a vein. Anyone who thinks you can’t is wrong! I have done this many, many times from veins and got the lovely fountain effect. Sometimes it can just dribble out and sometimes it shoots out with quite a bit of force. depends on the vein and how well you hit it. If you’ve tried this once or twice and didnt get the fountain just keep trying. Also arteries are located under a lot of soft tissue just above the bone, what you see through your skin are veins, not arteries. You seriously probably couldn’t hit an artery with a needle without medical training. Unless you have a blood disorder you couldn’t die from this even if you were trying. Even if you leave the tourniquet on and the needle in your body will stop the bleeding. Everything I just said comes from personal experience, leave ur guesses at home guys!
Also you can see the blood coming out in what appears to be a steady stream which would indicate a vein, not an artery. Arterial spray comes in burst. So, so many commentator fails on this post. FAILZORZ, guys, FAILZORZ
biohazard….i couldn’t have said it better…..even some people who work in the medical field and take blood samples for a living think they know everything about bloodplay lol
educate yourself, then post a comment
biohazard….i couldn’t have said it better…..even some people who work in the medical field and take blood samples for a living think they know everything about bloodplay lol
educate yourself, then post a comment
biohazard….i couldn’t have said it better…..even some people who work in the medical field and take blood samples for a living think they know everything about bloodplay lol
educate yourself, then post a comment
biohazard….i couldn’t have said it better…..even some people who work in the medical field and take blood samples for a living think they know everything about bloodplay lol
educate yourself, then post a comment
@48 Agreed.
@48 Agreed.
@48 Agreed.
@48 Agreed.
I find this beautiful.
Anyone crying for a disclaimer – NONE of the things on this website should be attempted without proper research and training. Someone could easily come on here and look at a scarification or suspension and think ‘golly gee I should go stab myself’.
I find this beautiful.
Anyone crying for a disclaimer – NONE of the things on this website should be attempted without proper research and training. Someone could easily come on here and look at a scarification or suspension and think ‘golly gee I should go stab myself’.