Hell no!
Latest Tattoo, Piercing, and Body Modification News
- Skin and Strings: The Art of Human Puppetryby JonathonOne of the most powerful things about being at a convention like OSC is the sheer concentration of experience, creativity, and capability in one place. When you’re surrounded by people who not only understand the technical complexities of suspension but are excited by the challenge… Read more: Skin and Strings: The Art of Human Puppetry
- Twelve Points to the Skyby JonathonThere’s a particular kind of magic that happens at your first big suspension gathering when you arrive with nerves, an open heart, and the quiet hope of flight. Guided by the encouragement of mentor Lynn Loheide and driven by the quiet confidence of belonging, Alex… Read more: Twelve Points to the Sky
- Ontario SusCon 2025by JonathonIn March 2025, BME attended the Ontario Suspension Convention in Hamilton, hosted by the Kevin Donaghy and the Ontario Suspension Collective. We had the pleasure to take part and help document the event, but also run a booth to sell a bunch of old (but… Read more: Ontario SusCon 2025
- Welcome Back to Body Modification Ezineby NefDear BME Community, We’ve been gone far too long, but BME is back to give people a voice, a space, a community. With time everything evolves, and BME may be different than you remember. Our goal is to stay true to Shannon and Rachel’s values… Read more: Welcome Back to Body Modification Ezine
- BME Social Mediaby NefWord of mouth has been our method of reuniting the community, and it has brought a substantial amount of us together. I am inspired by your loyalty and I want to remind more people of BME’s existence. In 2020 we gained control over @bmezine on… Read more: BME Social Media
- BMEShopby NefDespite the hurricanes in 2015 which destroyed almost all of what Rachel owned, she managed to save the original inventory from BME. We have relisted some of the stock on BMEShop.com with the hopes you may be interested. Our first drop includes a selection of… Read more: BMEShop
Comments
220 responses to “Firing Blanks?”
(And I left this computer and post and now my post doesn’t make sense after #36) – oh well!)
(And I left this computer and post and now my post doesn’t make sense after #36) – oh well!)
That so many people think the guy’s pointing a gun at the photographer shows what a well-taken image this is. Look at the angle on the gun. Bear in mind the photographer is very likely not standing right up close. The gun is pointing *past* the photographer – if it was pointing at them, the gun would be straight on.
That so many people think the guy’s pointing a gun at the photographer shows what a well-taken image this is. Look at the angle on the gun. Bear in mind the photographer is very likely not standing right up close. The gun is pointing *past* the photographer – if it was pointing at them, the gun would be straight on.
That so many people think the guy’s pointing a gun at the photographer shows what a well-taken image this is. Look at the angle on the gun. Bear in mind the photographer is very likely not standing right up close. The gun is pointing *past* the photographer – if it was pointing at them, the gun would be straight on.
That so many people think the guy’s pointing a gun at the photographer shows what a well-taken image this is. Look at the angle on the gun. Bear in mind the photographer is very likely not standing right up close. The gun is pointing *past* the photographer – if it was pointing at them, the gun would be straight on.
no worries Lexci Million- that is basically exactly what i did with my first post.
no worries Lexci Million- that is basically exactly what i did with my first post.
no worries Lexci Million- that is basically exactly what i did with my first post.
no worries Lexci Million- that is basically exactly what i did with my first post.
i wanted to add though- I am all for supporting the ‘choice’- even if I don’t personally agree with it for my body- one has the right to govern what they do to their own body- why I love this site.
I was way wrong about the sentiment as it was for another post- but even still if you chop off your penis it affects you more than anyone else.. whereas a gun being pointed at another affects others- even if it is an emotional reaction to those who have been victim’s of violent crimes.
Still I know we wont all love the same content- but I love that we can share our views when we don’t.. and share why.
i wanted to add though- I am all for supporting the ‘choice’- even if I don’t personally agree with it for my body- one has the right to govern what they do to their own body- why I love this site.
I was way wrong about the sentiment as it was for another post- but even still if you chop off your penis it affects you more than anyone else.. whereas a gun being pointed at another affects others- even if it is an emotional reaction to those who have been victim’s of violent crimes.
Still I know we wont all love the same content- but I love that we can share our views when we don’t.. and share why.
i wanted to add though- I am all for supporting the ‘choice’- even if I don’t personally agree with it for my body- one has the right to govern what they do to their own body- why I love this site.
I was way wrong about the sentiment as it was for another post- but even still if you chop off your penis it affects you more than anyone else.. whereas a gun being pointed at another affects others- even if it is an emotional reaction to those who have been victim’s of violent crimes.
Still I know we wont all love the same content- but I love that we can share our views when we don’t.. and share why.
i wanted to add though- I am all for supporting the ‘choice’- even if I don’t personally agree with it for my body- one has the right to govern what they do to their own body- why I love this site.
I was way wrong about the sentiment as it was for another post- but even still if you chop off your penis it affects you more than anyone else.. whereas a gun being pointed at another affects others- even if it is an emotional reaction to those who have been victim’s of violent crimes.
Still I know we wont all love the same content- but I love that we can share our views when we don’t.. and share why.
39:”That so many people think the guy’s pointing a gun at the photographer shows what a well-taken image this is.”
Um… not so much, personally. While I commend the blur of perspective in this shot, the only way this gun wasn’t essentially right off the camera lens was if this image was cropped from off-center on the original shot (which is possible, but I don’t personally know how you’d be able to get the blur to work just right that way) or if this was done with an exceptional optical zoon with the focus on a very tight spot.
There really arn’t many ways to take a picture down a gun without actualy taking a picture down a gun. Then again, I’ve used guns on film sets before and was careful enough to make sure to check the clip and the chamber anytime I even had it in my pocket for too long; shooting the actress (or one of the 12+ people surriounding the set) accidentally wasn’t a possibility I felt like having.
I personally don’t care for these shots, but then again I don’t *care* if people do them. I just dislike it when the shot involves an inherently dangerous practice.
39:”That so many people think the guy’s pointing a gun at the photographer shows what a well-taken image this is.”
Um… not so much, personally. While I commend the blur of perspective in this shot, the only way this gun wasn’t essentially right off the camera lens was if this image was cropped from off-center on the original shot (which is possible, but I don’t personally know how you’d be able to get the blur to work just right that way) or if this was done with an exceptional optical zoon with the focus on a very tight spot.
There really arn’t many ways to take a picture down a gun without actualy taking a picture down a gun. Then again, I’ve used guns on film sets before and was careful enough to make sure to check the clip and the chamber anytime I even had it in my pocket for too long; shooting the actress (or one of the 12+ people surriounding the set) accidentally wasn’t a possibility I felt like having.
I personally don’t care for these shots, but then again I don’t *care* if people do them. I just dislike it when the shot involves an inherently dangerous practice.
39:”That so many people think the guy’s pointing a gun at the photographer shows what a well-taken image this is.”
Um… not so much, personally. While I commend the blur of perspective in this shot, the only way this gun wasn’t essentially right off the camera lens was if this image was cropped from off-center on the original shot (which is possible, but I don’t personally know how you’d be able to get the blur to work just right that way) or if this was done with an exceptional optical zoon with the focus on a very tight spot.
There really arn’t many ways to take a picture down a gun without actualy taking a picture down a gun. Then again, I’ve used guns on film sets before and was careful enough to make sure to check the clip and the chamber anytime I even had it in my pocket for too long; shooting the actress (or one of the 12+ people surriounding the set) accidentally wasn’t a possibility I felt like having.
I personally don’t care for these shots, but then again I don’t *care* if people do them. I just dislike it when the shot involves an inherently dangerous practice.
39:”That so many people think the guy’s pointing a gun at the photographer shows what a well-taken image this is.”
Um… not so much, personally. While I commend the blur of perspective in this shot, the only way this gun wasn’t essentially right off the camera lens was if this image was cropped from off-center on the original shot (which is possible, but I don’t personally know how you’d be able to get the blur to work just right that way) or if this was done with an exceptional optical zoon with the focus on a very tight spot.
There really arn’t many ways to take a picture down a gun without actualy taking a picture down a gun. Then again, I’ve used guns on film sets before and was careful enough to make sure to check the clip and the chamber anytime I even had it in my pocket for too long; shooting the actress (or one of the 12+ people surriounding the set) accidentally wasn’t a possibility I felt like having.
I personally don’t care for these shots, but then again I don’t *care* if people do them. I just dislike it when the shot involves an inherently dangerous practice.
ooo edgy
ooo edgy
ooo edgy
ooo edgy
im sorry but i find this a pointless photo for the style of website its on. its a good photo non the less
im sorry but i find this a pointless photo for the style of website its on. its a good photo non the less
im sorry but i find this a pointless photo for the style of website its on. its a good photo non the less
im sorry but i find this a pointless photo for the style of website its on. its a good photo non the less
Damn, I was hoping for an IAM page to perv on as well.
Damn, I was hoping for an IAM page to perv on as well.
Damn, I was hoping for an IAM page to perv on as well.
Damn, I was hoping for an IAM page to perv on as well.
…there are handheld shutters too.
…there are handheld shutters too.
…there are handheld shutters too.
…there are handheld shutters too.
Wow, isn’t MistahG clever? It’s almost amusing to watch this emotionally retarded jerk-off try to convince himself that he’s “intellectually superior”, but it’s really just to pathetic to be funny. I shouldn’t be giving him the attention that he obviously craves, but fuck, is there anyone running the site who still gives a shit? Apparently not if that impotent prick’s obnoxious post with the malicious link isn’t being removed. Welcome to the new BME, what a refreshing new direction.
Wow, isn’t MistahG clever? It’s almost amusing to watch this emotionally retarded jerk-off try to convince himself that he’s “intellectually superior”, but it’s really just to pathetic to be funny. I shouldn’t be giving him the attention that he obviously craves, but fuck, is there anyone running the site who still gives a shit? Apparently not if that impotent prick’s obnoxious post with the malicious link isn’t being removed. Welcome to the new BME, what a refreshing new direction.
Wow, isn’t MistahG clever? It’s almost amusing to watch this emotionally retarded jerk-off try to convince himself that he’s “intellectually superior”, but it’s really just to pathetic to be funny. I shouldn’t be giving him the attention that he obviously craves, but fuck, is there anyone running the site who still gives a shit? Apparently not if that impotent prick’s obnoxious post with the malicious link isn’t being removed. Welcome to the new BME, what a refreshing new direction.
Wow, isn’t MistahG clever? It’s almost amusing to watch this emotionally retarded jerk-off try to convince himself that he’s “intellectually superior”, but it’s really just to pathetic to be funny. I shouldn’t be giving him the attention that he obviously craves, but fuck, is there anyone running the site who still gives a shit? Apparently not if that impotent prick’s obnoxious post with the malicious link isn’t being removed. Welcome to the new BME, what a refreshing new direction.
Hahahahhahaha. Thank you Giles, from the bottom of my heart. Really, your last comment just made my day, week even. Considering you’ve failed at making insightful, intellectual comments on this site (and I assume that elsewhere, as well) until now, and most likely will fail in the future, you can’t SERIOUSLY refer to yourself as a ruling, intellectuacl superior. A troll, sure, maybe one that knows how to use the English language properly, but nothing more. Get back to us when you do make a comment that actually has any meaning here, and we’ll reassess, ok? lulz.
Hahahahhahaha. Thank you Giles, from the bottom of my heart. Really, your last comment just made my day, week even. Considering you’ve failed at making insightful, intellectual comments on this site (and I assume that elsewhere, as well) until now, and most likely will fail in the future, you can’t SERIOUSLY refer to yourself as a ruling, intellectuacl superior. A troll, sure, maybe one that knows how to use the English language properly, but nothing more. Get back to us when you do make a comment that actually has any meaning here, and we’ll reassess, ok? lulz.
Hahahahhahaha. Thank you Giles, from the bottom of my heart. Really, your last comment just made my day, week even. Considering you’ve failed at making insightful, intellectual comments on this site (and I assume that elsewhere, as well) until now, and most likely will fail in the future, you can’t SERIOUSLY refer to yourself as a ruling, intellectuacl superior. A troll, sure, maybe one that knows how to use the English language properly, but nothing more. Get back to us when you do make a comment that actually has any meaning here, and we’ll reassess, ok? lulz.
Hahahahhahaha. Thank you Giles, from the bottom of my heart. Really, your last comment just made my day, week even. Considering you’ve failed at making insightful, intellectual comments on this site (and I assume that elsewhere, as well) until now, and most likely will fail in the future, you can’t SERIOUSLY refer to yourself as a ruling, intellectuacl superior. A troll, sure, maybe one that knows how to use the English language properly, but nothing more. Get back to us when you do make a comment that actually has any meaning here, and we’ll reassess, ok? lulz.
Just ignore Giles, already. He’s throwing a fit over the last change.
Not many of us are happy. But we don’t make children of ourselves over it, and should try to avoid doing so over one idiot with a superiority complex.
Just ignore Giles, already. He’s throwing a fit over the last change.
Not many of us are happy. But we don’t make children of ourselves over it, and should try to avoid doing so over one idiot with a superiority complex.
Just ignore Giles, already. He’s throwing a fit over the last change.
Not many of us are happy. But we don’t make children of ourselves over it, and should try to avoid doing so over one idiot with a superiority complex.
Just ignore Giles, already. He’s throwing a fit over the last change.
Not many of us are happy. But we don’t make children of ourselves over it, and should try to avoid doing so over one idiot with a superiority complex.
#42: The picture isn’t taken down the barrel – look at the angle. As for the way the blur is working with the gun being not right next to the camera – it’s called depth of field, and using the right lens. Something doesn’t have to be right up at the camera to be blurry. Trust me, I’m a photographer 😉
#42: The picture isn’t taken down the barrel – look at the angle. As for the way the blur is working with the gun being not right next to the camera – it’s called depth of field, and using the right lens. Something doesn’t have to be right up at the camera to be blurry. Trust me, I’m a photographer 😉
#42: The picture isn’t taken down the barrel – look at the angle. As for the way the blur is working with the gun being not right next to the camera – it’s called depth of field, and using the right lens. Something doesn’t have to be right up at the camera to be blurry. Trust me, I’m a photographer 😉
#42: The picture isn’t taken down the barrel – look at the angle. As for the way the blur is working with the gun being not right next to the camera – it’s called depth of field, and using the right lens. Something doesn’t have to be right up at the camera to be blurry. Trust me, I’m a photographer 😉